Vaccine coercion/bribery

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    NKBJ

    at the ark
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 21, 2010
    6,240
    149
    I pray this is true...
    Sir you remind me to resume a prayer I'd fallen away from, that He not give up on us.

    Side note...
    There's sometimes I wonder how many competing AI systems are calling the shots globally for the various overwhelmed cabals of wetware. We need divine intervention moment by moment.
     

    jsharmon7

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    119   0   0
    Nov 24, 2008
    7,827
    113
    Freedonia
    It appeared to me a narrative was established a few months back that the saline and vax vials look the same. More PSY-OP to get extra people in fear, emotional, and get the shot.

    Deep dive is that it's intentional since TPTB did not want everyone to get the vax. Why? Side effects such as the blood clots, among others, that appear to becoming all too common. This is not gleaned from what they call "news stories". It's from what I hear in person from affected individuals and increasing mentions of this in forum threads. So if there's evil intentions (most likely), then there's motive not to alert everyone at the start. The entire reporting system is rigged, particularly the initial deaths within 14 days or was it a month, not counted in VAERS. There's a couple other data systems showing much worse, and it's still early in the program.

    If you think about it, a lot of shots were given approximately 6 months ago, and there's been ADE and the requirement for boosters with the same dose of mRNA as the original shots. I have seen that as much as 85% of the original shots are saline, hence the booster program that you surprisingly didn't hear about in the beginning :dunno: How convenient to capture the vaxxed unvaxxed with a potentially real shot that appears to be creating much more chaos, or worse, than a manipulated numbers fear porn flu virus. Eventually they get the experiment into everyone that is willing to do the infinity and beyond boosters.

    In a few years there won't be any more conspiracy theories to bloviate, as they'll all come true. The whole thing is very sad and as you've found out with the rejected inspirational direct talk about "show me your papers", it's probably just going to continue, people are not taking a stand. I often wonder what will trigger the masses to begin rejecting what is being done to them.
    So are you saying 85% of the vaccines have been saline? Or are you saying they’re saline now?
     

    tim87tr

    Freedom lover
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Jul 3, 2010
    1,437
    113
    Eastern IL
    So are you saying 85% of the vaccines have been saline? Or are you saying they’re saline now?
    Something I'd read up to 85% are saline. I don't think it's that high, but my WAG is 50%. My theory is that if everyone had a bad reaction to the shot, less would initially take it. People I know that had a reaction did not take the second and won't take a booster.

    Doesn't fit the narrative and outrageous push for EVERYONE to get the shot, do their part, blah, blah, blah, if they're scared from a bad reaction from the outset. It's just my current thoughts....until I see otherwise as I've stated before. Will definitely know a whole lot more by end of year and next Spring.
     

    jsharmon7

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    119   0   0
    Nov 24, 2008
    7,827
    113
    Freedonia
    Something I'd read up to 85% are saline. I don't think it's that high, but my WAG is 50%. My theory is that if everyone had a bad reaction to the shot, less would initially take it. People I know that had a reaction did not take the second and won't take a booster.

    Doesn't fit the narrative and outrageous push for EVERYONE to get the shot, do their part, blah, blah, blah, if they're scared from a bad reaction from the outset. It's just my current thoughts....until I see otherwise as I've stated before. Will definitely know a whole lot more by end of year and next Spring.
    Thanks for the clarification, I may have just been reading it wrong. If the theory is 50-85% of the original vaccines were just saline, what does that do the repeated claims of them killing people and making them sick? And the alleged ADE? And the VAERS data? I don’t see how the two claims can exist at the same time.

    And I understand you are just stating a theory, and not saying it’s absolute fact.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,952
    113
    Arcadia
    Thanks for the clarification, I may have just been reading it wrong. If the theory is 50-85% of the original vaccines were just saline, what does that do the repeated claims of them killing people and making them sick? And the alleged ADE? And the VAERS data? I don’t see how the two claims can exist at the same time.

    And I understand you are just stating a theory, and not saying it’s absolute fact.
    Not saying this is what is/was happening but theoretically, if they vaccinated 80% with a placebo they could both calm concerns about the vaccine with all of the "successful" vaccinations and limit the number of potential problem/side effects. Seems like the type of thing they should be doing in testing. Unless.....this is testing in progress?
     

    jsharmon7

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    119   0   0
    Nov 24, 2008
    7,827
    113
    Freedonia
    Not saying this is what is/was happening but theoretically, if they vaccinated 80% with a placebo they could both calm concerns about the vaccine with all of the "successful" vaccinations and limit the number of potential problem/side effects. Seems like the type of thing they should be doing in testing. Unless.....this is testing in progress?
    Sure, that’s not unreasonable if they had reason to believe bad things would happen. All I’m saying is any previous claims of vaccine side effects are null and void if that’s the case. I’ve seen repeated claims of the vaccine being harmful, so if people were given placebo to prevent that, what gives? The claims were lies? Hypochondriacs?
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    104,240
    149
    Southside Indy
    Sure, that’s not unreasonable if they had reason to believe bad things would happen. All I’m saying is any previous claims of vaccine side effects are null and void if that’s the case. I’ve seen repeated claims of the vaccine being harmful, so if people were given placebo to prevent that, what gives? The claims were lies? Hypochondriacs?
    Or the ones with the side effects were the only ones given the "real" vaccines, and if a big enough majority of those given the "real" vaccines all had reactions? That would still make for a substantial reaction rate.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,952
    113
    Arcadia
    Sure, that’s not unreasonable if they had reason to believe bad things would happen. All I’m saying is any previous claims of vaccine side effects are null and void if that’s the case. I’ve seen repeated claims of the vaccine being harmful, so if people were given placebo to prevent that, what gives? The claims were lies? Hypochondriacs?
    You're assuming those who have experienced bad side effects were given the placebo.

    DD beat me to it.
     

    jsharmon7

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    119   0   0
    Nov 24, 2008
    7,827
    113
    Freedonia
    You're assuming those who have experienced bad side effects were given the placebo.

    DD beat me to it.
    To be honest, it’s all speculation based on a theoretical high percentage of people given saline. If 15% got the real vaccine, then we could do the math and see if the claims of injury are 15% of the total people given the vaccine so far. I think we would have to assume that everyone had a bad reaction AND reported it to VAERS. Again, all speculation. And I’ve believed all along the VAERS data is incredibly suspect, which refutes my own argument. :n00b:
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,952
    113
    Arcadia
    To be honest, it’s all speculation based on a theoretical high percentage of people given saline. If 15% got the real vaccine, then we could do the math and see if the claims of injury are 15% of the total people given the vaccine so far. I think we would have to assume that everyone had a bad reaction AND reported it to VAERS. Again, all speculation.
    It's all hypothetical
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,215
    149
    Columbus, OH
    What if you recovered from a case of covid mild enough you didn't realize you had it?
    If you had an actual infection, you should probably have a detectable level of antibodies whether you were asymptomatic or not

    Otherwise how would you differentiate between the asymptomatic (which they say exist) and those who have never had it
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom