I'll let the totality of your posts on the topic do the detailing. The last one I quoted was particularly illuminating.humor me - detail what my position is.
Your position is what the majority says it ishumor me - detail what my position is.
Thank you for providing evidence supporting my position.
Self reflection, or just thinking that you're immune?No one likes to admit when they've been fooled.
If your position is found to be hard to define/determine by a cross-section of your fellow INGO members, whose fault do you think that is?Your position is what the majority says it is
If your position is found to be hard to define/determine by a cross-section of your fellow INGO members, whose fault do you think that is?
As I once told Kut, maybe just try unambiguously saying what you actually mean. This is real life, not debate club
That you consider this, and internet forum, real life is telling. What you say only makes sense in a one-on-one conversation. On here, it's not the original post that causes this confusion but rather the acceptance of all the responses to the original post as being part of the original post. How else can you explain to me someone definitively saying a person voted for Joe Biden when that person never posted doing so? Now the difference between you and I is that I question my perception to make sure my understanding of reality of correct whereas you just posted your perception is reality.If your position is found to be hard to define/determine by a cross-section of your fellow INGO members, whose fault do you think that is?
As I once told Kut, maybe just try unambiguously saying what you actually mean. This is real life, not debate club
The difference between you and I is that according to you I slither whereas you choose to ignore and deflectJust how do you expect them to leave wiggle room to slither out of a previous statement when the facts change if they did that?
Aren't you trying to create a perception of bug with this post?That you consider this, and internet forum, real life is telling. What you say only makes sense in a one-on-one conversation. On here, it's not the original post that causes this confusion but rather the acceptance of all the responses to the original post as being part of the original post. How else can you explain to me someone definitively saying a person voted for Joe Biden when that person never posted doing so? Now the difference between you and I is that I question my perception to make sure my understanding of reality of correct whereas you just posted your perception is reality.
Well how about you tell me? If I am what perception am I trying to create of bug?Aren't you trying to create a perception of bug with this post?
You've made an assertion about something you cannot know.Well how about you tell me? If I am what perception am I trying to create of bug?
What exactly did I assert that I cannot know be specificYou've made an assertion about something you cannot know.
What exactly did I assert that I cannot know be specific
I'll lead you this far.Now the difference between you and I is that I question my perception to make sure my understanding of reality of correct whereas you just posted your perception is reality.
Okay did he not post saying perception is reality? Also note that I asked you some questions so I can understand your assertion. You did not give a direct answer but rather posted that you would lead me this far. Questioning a perception can only go so far when the person you're understand trying to understand won't give a direct answerI'll lead you this far.