Ok, I guess I stand corrected.
Dirty Don
I had a few comments along this line of thinking but it is best left in the closet.
MrJ you can believe as you wish. I know you are not a 2 party guy but seriously, if he had even been accused of this it would have gone Nuclear on the main stream Bravo Sierra channels.
My spouse is a news junky and we have not heard anything about this. Does not mean a lot that we haven't but seriously.....
Ok, I guess I stand corrected.
Dirty Don
Wouldn't matter anyway, Trump supporters don't even look at the wall... let alone care about all the stuff stuck to it.
Once we achieve one party rule we can crack a beer and talk about DJT and how it was before the equality laws.
And the stuff he's said and agreed about on the Stern show about his daughter is purely disgusting.
The truth is that he who washed his hands actively tried to avoid the sacrifice presented to him by an angry mob.
Trump supporters willingly, nay zealously, sacrificed the GOP in the primaries.
Using your own reasoning, does not the manus lavit analogy include Trump supporters, including yourself?
Look, at this point, if DJT wins, I'm going to start believing in manifest destiny. (Well, I'll still be skeptical.)
Your reference is to a small, but important, role player. No less important than the betrayer, without whom the story would not be possible.
Personally, I think history will remember Trump as a footnote, an also ran. Somewhere between John Anderson and George Wallace. A 3rd party candidate who managed to hijack a major party. Political Science classes will use him as a reference like General Winfield Scott as the last nominee of a party that collapsed, and split.
and that will affect my life how?
He's not running for pope.
When every candidate in the race has severe and deep character flaws, then character drops off the equasion.So, character doesn't count? Maybe that's why we're in the mess we're in. Folks like you don't give a rip about politicians character and it reflects on the nation. Thanks a lot.
NEW YORK, Ny. – Less than twenty-four hours after accepting his party’s nomination and delivering the longest acceptance speech in nearly four decades, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump unveiled his plan to restore law and order in America, which he bleakly described as being under siege by illegal immigrants, the Islamic State, and race-related violence.
“We’re going to put an end to that,” Trump said during a post-convention interview with The New York Times. “We’re going to federalize every police department in this country. We’re going to eliminate the red tape and it’s going to give police the ability to do their jobs effectively and, believe me, this is something that’s going to happen within my first one hundred days in office.”
Under Trump’s plan, city and state police departments would fall under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security and would therefore be granted broad authorities to enforce the law. “They’re going to receive the best weapons, training, and resources this country has to offer,” Trump promised. “We’re going to put an end to jurisdictional restrictions and increase police capabilities in terms of surveillance and the use of deadly force. Not only that, we’re going to eliminate this so-called standard for probable cause; it’s very limiting and, frankly, outdated. Our police forces are going to have much more freedom in terms of who they can arrest and why.”
Reagan's late-breaking surge that year is generally attributed to the only presidential debate between Carter and Reagan -- held one week before the election, on Oct. 28 -- which seemed to move voter preferences in Reagan's direction, as well as the ongoing Iran hostage crisis, which reached its one-year anniversary on Election Day.