They are trying, that's a fact, but the general population is not listening.Lie lie lie.
Thats all these democrats can do.
There after Trump because they know they cant beat him if they dont cheat.
And they know they got away with it once but wont happen this next time.
Dont be surprised if they dont ban Trump from running in 2024.
... before I started hopelessly pressing the fast forward >> button to get past the boring parts.I started to watch it, but only made it about 3 minutes into the opening statement...
That committee was filled with biased Trump haters. Even the two "Republicans" were handpicked by Pelosi. This was not a bipartisan effort to objectively examine all of the facts. These hearings are a sham.
Can’t speak for others, but “they“ can keep anyone off the ballot with dirty tricks and shenanigans like just occurred in Michigan using ballot access laws and regulations. If Trump ran as an independent I bet they would keep him off the ballot in 10 states. So “they” is a collection of election officials, political operatives, and politicians themselves…Who are the "they" who are going to "ban" Trump from running?
The RNC could actively work to keep him off the Republican primary ballot (and that's a real possibility), but the generic "they" cannot "ban" him from running, whomever "they" are.
Well, if "they" (theWho are the "they" who are going to "ban" Trump from running?
The RNC could actively work to keep him off the Republican primary ballot (and that's a real possibility), but the generic "they" cannot "ban" him from running, whomever "they" are.
Agreed. But that's not a "ban". (I fully expect those sorts of shenanigans, from the RNC. But parties have wide latitude in who they let on their party ballot. That's not a "ban"; that's freedom of association. Trump can always run as an independent, in that case.)Can’t speak for others, but “they“ can keep anyone off the ballot with dirty tricks and shenanigans like just occurred in Michigan using ballot access laws and regulations. If Trump ran as an independent I bet they would keep him off the ballot in 10 states. So “they” is a collection of election officials, political operatives, and politicians themselves…
...and you really think that is probable in any way whatsoever?Well, if "they" (the democrats) can get Trump convicted of a serious enough crime, he would be disqualified (banned) from running.
The parties have conspired to limit access to independent candidates with petition requirements and timing requirements often invoked after the party strings the candidate along so as to run out of time…Trump can always run as an independent, in that case.)
Agreed. But that's not a "ban". That's simply playing bureaucratic shenanigans.The parties have conspired to limit access to independent candidates with petition requirements and timing requirements often invoked after the party strings the candidate along so as to run out of time…
Got you, I did not read the word “ban” in a literal sense but in the spirit I perceived the post to be about.Agreed. But that's not a "ban". That's simply playing bureaucratic shenanigans.