Either he embellished a LOT, or before the rule change his auto sears were considered machine guns by themselves. (and he didnt also highlight the part about the sears being printed)$25 to $50 for auto sears.
60 auto sears x $50 = $3000
What am I missing?
Yeah. The way I read the thread, the rules changed after he took advantage of some vague wording announcing the buy back.Either he embellished a LOT, or before the rule change his auto sears were considered machine guns by themselves. (and he didnt also highlight the part about the sears being printed)
I too sense some slight of hand with the truth.
Im pretty sure IN has a law prohibiting the state from using tax payer funds to "buy back" firearms.I kinda wish they’d do one around here sometime, I got an old sxs shotgun that was my father in law’s and his wife insisted I take it as something to remember him by, of course neither of his sons wanted it, and I didn’t particularly care for the guy, and it’s in no condition to shot. I’d take $50 for it in a heartbeat!
I guess I’ll have to sell it here… no low ball offers! I know what I got!Im pretty sure IN has a law prohibiting the state from using tax payer funds to "buy back" firearms.
While I applaud your generosity, under no circumstances would I ever give the government, or those that support "buybacks" of stuff they never owned, the satisfaction of believing such programs make a difference, or achieve any good at all. Especially when it's at taxpayer expense.Quite a few years ago a church organization in the City of Gary hosted a buyback exchange for gift cards in conjunction with local law enforcement so I brought several firearms that weren't particularly valuable that I wanted to depart with.
I declined to take the gift cards and asked that they be given to others in the community that are in need.
To each his own. What I did proved just how radicicolous buybacks are. I turned in unwanted not particularly valuable firearms and I guarantee there were others that did the same just to get rid of them. Also I considered my decline of the gift cards and requested them to be given to others in need in their community to be a charitable contribution. in the process.While I applaud your generosity, under no circumstances would I ever give the government, or those that support "buybacks" of stuff they never owned, the satisfaction of believing such programs make a difference, or achieve any good at all. Especially when it's at taxpayer expense.
I would sooner take any worthless/non-functional weapon I owned and melt it down for a paperweight or ballast.
Unless it was a Highpoint.
That last line got me...While I applaud your generosity, under no circumstances would I ever give the government, or those that support "buybacks" of stuff they never owned, the satisfaction of believing such programs make a difference, or achieve any good at all. Especially when it's at taxpayer expense.
I would sooner take any worthless/non-functional weapon I owned and melt it down for a paperweight or ballast.
Unless it was a Highpoint.
This was my whole point and I think that alot of this is going on with buybacks. People are using them as a depository to get rid of unwanted broken invaluable firearms. That's what I did and I requested that the gift cards be given to others in the community that need them more than I.