Just curious. Wondering what INGO thinks about the difference between these two Marlin rifles. The 60 generally seems to cost more. Is it worth the extra cash?
So, two questions:
1. If you were purchasing another Marlin rimfire semi-auto, which would you purchase and why, 60 or 795?
2. Are these subject to the same Remlin disasters as the 1894, 45-70, 336, or did Remington manage to make these right? Should one look for a JM on the barrel as one does for the other caliber models?
1. If you were purchasing another Marlin rimfire semi-auto, which would you purchase and why, 60 or 795?
2. Are these subject to the same Remlin disasters as the 1894, 45-70, 336, or did Remington manage to make these right? Should one look for a JM on the barrel as one does for the other caliber models?