Bump stocks and pistol braces are completely different accessories with totally different applications. The pistol brace should be justified as an aid to those with physical disabilities to enable them to still enjoy the sport of shooting and hunting. I don’t understand what they would gain by banning them.The letter was withdrawn, but i would expect them to attack again.
As for why, they're anti-2nd amendment of course, and they thought there wouldn't be much of a fight, like with bump stocks.
They are different, but banning bump stocks set a legal precedent and lots of people predicted it would be a slippery slope.Bump stocks and pistol braces are completely different accessories with totally different applications. The pistol brace should be justified as an aid to those with physical disabilities to enable them to still enjoy the sport of shooting and hunting. I don’t understand what they would gain by banning them.
No doubtThe letter was withdrawn but given the environment I'd imagine it was temporary until they get the OK from the next admin, regardless of the public backlash. They're going to try to do it one way or another.