Michigan Senate Passes Animal Cruelty Bill Which Includes Sodomy Ban

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BADWOLF

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 24, 2015
    366
    18
    Small Town USA
    So now if you live in Michigan and your wife, husband, boyfriend or girlfriend perform oral or anal sex you are now committing a felony.

    This is what was snuck in to the bill.

    " a person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony "

    You Could Go To Prison For Performing Oral Or Anal Sex In Michigan

    The original intention of the bill was admirable and needed to be passed but leave it up to a religified Republican to F-it up. Was having a discussion at work yesterday about how religion needs to stay out of politics. You can be a Christian, Jew, budist, Hindu ***** that is your PRIVATE business but you cannot and shouldn't apply your personal belief's to legislate the masses. Because at the point you do I'll tell you to take your god or gods and shove him, her or them up your ass.

    http://www.addictinginfo.org/2016/02/06/michigan-republicans-pass-bill-that-would-put-gay-and-straight-couples-in-prison/

    Excerpt from above link

    " The Supreme Court struck down anti-sodomy laws in 2003, but conservatives across the country have been fighting to keep the laws on the books ever since. That includes Ken Cuccinelli in Virginia who tried to outlaw “carnal knowledge” between married couples in 2013 as he failed to become the state’s governor.

    And just like Cuccinelli, it appears Jones is trying to insert Christian fundamentalist law into the civil law, which would create a legal clusterf*ck in this country since it would destroy privacy. In order to enforce such a law, it would take millions upon millions of dollars, a spying program, and a cop in every household to make sure women and men are only doing it missionary style and that their reproductive organs are in the place where they believe God intended them to be.

    In short, whenever Republicans say they support smaller government, they are full of ****, and so is Rick Jones. But I bet Justice Scalia is totally behind him all the way. "
     
    Last edited:

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,865
    149
    Valparaiso
    " a person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony "

    It seems that those crying about this have themselves defined what an "abominable and detestable crime against nature" is...because it's not in the law.
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,560
    113
    Fort Wayne
    It seems that those crying about this have themselves defined what an "abominable and detestable crime against nature" is...because it's not in the law.

    That was my question - even after reading the bill I don't see that is ever defined.

    Does getting to second base with my cat qualify?
     

    eldirector

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Apr 29, 2009
    14,677
    113
    Brownsburg, IN
    Well, some of us may be perfectly safe. For better or worse.

    Need to see more than the quoted section to have any idea what they are actually talking about, though.
     

    ghuns

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    9,368
    113
    " a person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony "

    It seems that those crying about this have themselves defined what an "abominable and detestable crime against nature" is...because it's not in the law.

    Then exactly what felony are they gonna be guilty of?:dunno:
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,865
    149
    Valparaiso
    This is all about an old law that Michigan never repealed, but isn't, won't and can't be enforced as the anal sex lobby "fears"....except as to animals.

    Nothing to see here.
     

    ghuns

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    9,368
    113
    This is all about an old law that Michigan never repealed, but isn't, won't and can't be enforced as the anal sex lobby "fears"....except as to animals.

    Nothing to see here.

    So just remove the word "mankind". What's the big deal? Do start sumfin, won't be nuthin.:dunno:

    I agree that fears of them actually trying to enforce such a law are unfounded, but why poke the bears?;)
     

    Expat

    Pdub
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Feb 27, 2010
    110,315
    113
    Michiana
    This is all about an old law that Michigan never repealed, but isn't, won't and can't be enforced as the anal sex lobby "fears"....except as to animals.

    Nothing to see here.

    Yep, someone was talking about it on the radio. The whole story is basically made up by one blogger and then picked up by the radical homosexual web sites.

    Even the leftist people at Snopes so it is mostly false.
    Michigan Senate Passes Law Banning Sodomy? : snopes.com
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,075
    113
    Uranus
    This calls for a song..... Everybody sing along.

    [video=youtube;w6AnK8pdcsE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6AnK8pdcsE[/video]
     

    ghuns

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    9,368
    113

    GOP Sen. Rick Jones, the author of SB 291, told NCRM in an exclusive interview that he chose not to remove the unconstitutional sodomy ban from the bill because he feared such a move could derail the entire measure.

    Shouldn't we be more concerned that they could not pass a constitutional bill without derailing the measure?

    I mean, shouldn't passing legislation that is actually constitutionally okey-dokey be a goal of our law makers?

    I figured on INGO, it would be considered the highest goal.:dunno:

    Oh well, it's just Meeeeeechigan.;)
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    526,562
    Messages
    9,844,828
    Members
    54,074
    Latest member
    rickyjohnson111
    Top Bottom