local assault rifle ban poll

[arbitrary]

Home Page » The Herald Bulletin

At the bottom. You know the drill.

 

[actaeon277]

Voted

 

[DKY197]

With my vote we're winning at 59%. Thanks for sharing.

 

[Robjps]

They seem to be doctoring the results. It just went from 66 no votes to 62.

 

[drillsgt]

Did anybody read the editorial toward the bottom of the page? I thought this was from somewhere down by Bloomington, not Anderson.

 

[dansgotguns]

71 votes now

 

[cobber]

Spiegelberg, a mother and activist from Fishers, is the chairperson of the Indianapolis Chapter of One Million Moms 4 Gun Control [name change recently?], a group founded by Zionsville-resident Shannon Watts to fight aggressively for increased gun control.

“Guns are part of our history. We’re a colonial country [], and they’ve been used for hunting and self-defense throughout history, and that’s fine,” Spiegelberg said. “Unfortunately, the laws in our country give people a chance to accumulate so much more than what they need.”

Spiegelberg said there are many responsible gun owners who are supportive of her organization and supportive of gun regulations.

This is a spokesman for the Thousand Lickspittle Hoplophobes for Tyranny? Pathetic. (See what I did there?)

 

[xfrostybeersx]

93 NO Votes
46 Yes Votes
65% to 32%

VOTE NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[nailknocker]

Where is this poll, I am not seeing it.

 

[gunman41mag]

i voted & it's 65% for our gun rights

 

[braggracing]

Where is this poll, I am not seeing it.

Bottom right of page. Up to 64% keep it goin

 

[Car Ramrod]

Where is this poll, I am not seeing it.

Right side about 2/3 the way down.

 

[tsm]

Voted.

 

[CathyInBlue]

That editorial "Special Report: Nation of Arms" contains so much fail, including the oft debunked "43 times more likely to kill yourself or a loved one than an intruder" statistic. And I love how they nebulously, vaguely, and imprecisely keep mentioning throughout that there exists some subset of the gun owning American public who agree with the gun restricting/regulating/banning American public without ever remotely quantifying those numbers, or specifying precisely what they agree on. "larger magazines"? Which magazines? How much larger? "exotic weapons"? WTF are those?

So. Much. Fail.

If you're unsure about favouring a ban on so-called, fictional "assault weapons", that means you're a sheep who will go along with the banners. I lump you in with the "Yes" votes. That still puts it at 126/56 (69%/31%) in favour of "No".

 

[rockhopper46038]

Doesn't show up on the mobile site I was directed by the link. I'll vote when I get on a computer.

 

[Redtbird]

Just voted.

NO: 139 votes/71%
YES: 52 votes/27%
Not sure: 3%

 

[Lonestar6]

Where is this poll, I am not seeing it.

Me either. Glad I am not alone.

 

[hfdcowboy]

I voted, we are at 71% lets keep it going.

 

[ryanmercer]

Where is this poll, I am not seeing it.

About 60% down the page just right of center. If you are using noscript I had to temporarily allow all to get it to show.

 

[Desdinova]

72% voted no so far