As for the discussion of "acquire", "get", and "well, I'm a firefighter not a lawyer"....
I'm sure the comment was meant to appeal to the blue collar worker of the state.
I'm a blue collar worker.
When I hire a plumber, I expect a guy to know his tools and how to use them. And know the rules/laws the apply.
When I hire an electrican, I expect a guy to know his tools and how to use them. And know the rules/laws the apply.
And here's the thing....
When I hire a politican, I expect a guy to know his tools and how to use them. And know the rules/laws the apply.
So... if you're trying to decide LAW, you should probably NOT be arguing that "get" and "acquire" are different, especially WHEN THEY'RE NOT!
Close . . . Pinner v Indiana
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/05091701RR.pdf
I thought it would be brought up as it's related to CC and some of the pundits at the time stated it would create a de facto version of CC if cops couldn't demand you produce one if they suspect you're carrying. I've got my own concerns regarding CC as it potentially complicates national reciprocity if not in legislation, but in practice. The cost of a lifetime LTCH should be revisited but it's a revenue stream so driving it down is a Sysiphean Task pushing in the opposite direction.
25% into the broadcast (sans commercials).
Dan Forestal's new organization: BLM = Blog Lexical Matter
Flash mob demonstrations and protests pending.
John
so basically, I should skip the rest of this episode since I already listened to the first ten minutes?
so basically, I should skip the rest of this episode since I already listened to the first ten minutes?
If you want to listen to the Forestal "discussion", Guy basically dropped a 45 minute segment on his iTunes podcast this afternoon.
Is this a new/continued discussion? Or is it just an excerpt from the show Saturday?
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?st...ile.php?id=100000158672409&ref=content_filter
Come on join the argument