I don't see that contention anywhere in the article.I believe the actions of the elections offices violated both the federal constitution and state constitutions by creating unequal voting opportunities in democratic strongholds.
No, it doesn't, in fact does not mention violating fed/state constitutions... AT ALL.The article makes that pretty clear but the courts, I believe, will not get involved in this because orange man bad.
The watchdog that filed the action, Center for Renewing America (CRA) contends that the donations funded partisan activities that they contend violates 501(c)(3) non-profit guidelines.
They are arguing 501(c)(3) non-profit status.
How so? Get out the vote and making it easier to vote during COVID constitute stealing the election?Like so many things from the election until now, they cannot be shown to back up Trumps assertions that the election was stolen.
THIS... we agree upon... IRS should issue a ruling whether or not allowed activities done only in certain election subdivisions constitutes partisan activity or not. If it is, Zuck owns taxes on the $400M. If not, then we need our own.That the IRS will not do anything is hardly surprising and a continuation of their actions where conservatives get investigated and leftists skate by.
They definitely constantly try new "tricks" and call foul if the Rs duplicate it in the next election cycle.The left also creates new entities constantly so they rarely are caught up with.