I see you're in Bloomington. Seems a pattern is emerging...Moscow is a blue dot on a very red state and is normally very chill, lots of hippies and liberals all protesting make peace not war BS. Legendary farmers market there (hippies can grow some food).
research for his Crim J PhD dissertation?What was his motive?
Anything but a card carrying Democrat is evil.Interesting they went out of their way to identify him as a registered Libertarian…
Sheepdogs often blend in with sheep.I see you're in Bloomington. Seems a pattern is emerging...
Police identified Bryan Christopher Kohberger as the suspect accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in November through DNA using public genealogy databases, law enforcement sources told ABC News.
Where exactly do these databases come from? Does this mean that companies like ancestry.com keep records of DNA that individuals send in to them, and the police searched those records, or something else?
I’m guessing Pretty Blond Girl syndrome.What was his motive?
If people read the fine print on the terms of service when they sign up for these DNA things, they'd likely understand that....Does this mean that companies like ancestry.com keep records of DNA that individuals send in to them, and the police searched those records...
Not trying to imply that I have a problem with it; I've never used one myself, and TBH probably wouldn't have read the terms and conditions if I had, so I was just curious about the technology side of things. Like, does this mean the suspect himself must have used a service like this at some point, or could they have narrowed the field down just by finding close matches to his DNA like if say, someone in his family had done an ancestry test?If people read the fine print on the terms of service when they sign up for these DNA things, they'd likely understand that.
Stupid people who watch genealogy TV shows (which were probably made with government money) voluntarily sending in their DNA.Where exactly do these databases come from? Does this mean that companies like ancestry.com keep records of DNA that individuals send in to them, and the police searched those records, or something else?
No, it means ancest. dot com is a shill co. for uncle suger. As I’ve suspected from day one. The feds will not be happy until they can follow every person born in the country 24/7/365 from day of birth to day of death.Where exactly do these databases come from? Does this mean that companies like ancestry.com keep records of DNA that individuals send in to them, and the police searched those records, or something else?
People are not necessarily stupid for trying to use their DNA to find their families. Like anything people would have to weigh their desire to learn of other family members against the loss of privacy.Stupid people who watch genealogy TV shows (which were probably made with government money) voluntarily sending in their DNA.
It's one of the dumbest things the American public has ever done. We handed the government a universal population DNA database. Doesn't matter that you didn't submit your DNA, they have enough to hunt down your family and threaten/pressure them to give you up.
It's not their loss of privacy, it's mine. I didn't send anything in to any database, but they can use it to find me just fine.People are not necessarily stupid for trying to use their DNA to find their families. Like anything people would have to weigh their desire to learn of other family members against the loss of privacy.