jblomenberg16
Grandmaster
I've been blessed in life to have a lot of great friends and family members that enjoy shooting as much as I do. Generally it is accepted that when shooting together, we all take turns shooting the others' guns and we call it even at the end of the day.
Recently I've been shooting with a few guys from work who are seeing why so many of us have EBR disease. I've continued to be generous with my personal ammo stash, and really don't mind sharing at all. I enjoy the commraderie, and have learned a lot from them along the way, plus had the opportunity to shoot guns I may not have otherwise shot.
Yesterday one of them approached me about paying me for some of the ammo he shot through my AR. I hadn't really ever pondered the thought, so I had kind of dumbstruck moment (and probably a similar look on my face). The other guy then offered the same thing. He happens to own the land we shoot on, so I felt even more guilty for thinking about taking payment. I told them I would take no such payment, and that I was just happy to have guys to go shooting with and a place to go shooting at.
One of the proposed solutions we came up with after the ensuing back and for negotiating (like when you argue over who's paying for dinner) is that next time I place an ammo order, we'd all chip in and split 1000rds of 5.56. That seems to be a good way to do it, so I thought maybe I'd by 500rds, and let them buy 250rds. Nodobody goes broke that way, and we have enough ammo for a couple of trips if we're smart about resisting mag dumps.
How do you guys do it? For some reason it feels like the wrong thing to do, and that I'm either paying to have friends, or they're paying to be my friend. On the other hand, at around $.40 a pop, I can't afford to go through my stash 3x as fast as I would alone. The replacement cost right now is a lot higher than when I bought the ammo, so that compounds things a bit.
I kind of half heartedly joked that they just needed to each get an AR so that we wouldn't have to have that kind of discussion again. We'd then naturally each have a few thousand rounds stashed away , and then we could shoot as much as we wanted. Maybe that's the better solution?
Recently I've been shooting with a few guys from work who are seeing why so many of us have EBR disease. I've continued to be generous with my personal ammo stash, and really don't mind sharing at all. I enjoy the commraderie, and have learned a lot from them along the way, plus had the opportunity to shoot guns I may not have otherwise shot.
Yesterday one of them approached me about paying me for some of the ammo he shot through my AR. I hadn't really ever pondered the thought, so I had kind of dumbstruck moment (and probably a similar look on my face). The other guy then offered the same thing. He happens to own the land we shoot on, so I felt even more guilty for thinking about taking payment. I told them I would take no such payment, and that I was just happy to have guys to go shooting with and a place to go shooting at.
One of the proposed solutions we came up with after the ensuing back and for negotiating (like when you argue over who's paying for dinner) is that next time I place an ammo order, we'd all chip in and split 1000rds of 5.56. That seems to be a good way to do it, so I thought maybe I'd by 500rds, and let them buy 250rds. Nodobody goes broke that way, and we have enough ammo for a couple of trips if we're smart about resisting mag dumps.
How do you guys do it? For some reason it feels like the wrong thing to do, and that I'm either paying to have friends, or they're paying to be my friend. On the other hand, at around $.40 a pop, I can't afford to go through my stash 3x as fast as I would alone. The replacement cost right now is a lot higher than when I bought the ammo, so that compounds things a bit.
I kind of half heartedly joked that they just needed to each get an AR so that we wouldn't have to have that kind of discussion again. We'd then naturally each have a few thousand rounds stashed away , and then we could shoot as much as we wanted. Maybe that's the better solution?