Liberal gun control:
1. Take away guns from law-abiding citizens
2. Wring hands and moan about results.
3. Blame Bush for conditions which "produced" thugs
4. Repeat.
Liberal gun control:
1. Pass strict gun laws.
2. Wring hands and moan about results.
3. Blame Bush for conditions which "produced" thugs
4. Throw millions of dollars at "moral problems" but without producing results.
5. Repeat.
I say we give the thugs marksman classes, that way they can more efficiently eliminate each other, and stop killing little kids.
A lose ship? Excellent prognosis!!Looks like Obama is running a lose ship in Chicago as well.
Hadn't thought of the use of criminals to control the law-abiding. An interesting point! (It's kind of like the Commie bogeyman to justify large military expenditures.)I would argue (no purple used or implied) that gun control does in fact work extremely well in Chicago. The sheep are herded from their homes to work and back, and are extremely compliant lest they become wolf-chow. As always, gun control is about control, not guns, and the thugs play a critical role in presenting a bogeyman that encourages people to sacrifice their liberty in exchange for the illusion of safety--and then, when push comes to shove, all they can do for themselves is beg, 'pleeeeeeeeease use Vaseline'.