I disagree with those here that said at least it is a good start. Training to win a gun fight or even survive one without a gun of your own is a joke. It is a pretend world where we continue to kid ourselves that the solution to stopping school shootings is something other than good people having a gun and being able to use it effectively. As a people how many more object lessons is it going to take? 100 people killed in school shootings in this country since Feb. 1996, and more than that wounded. Have two school fires in the same year that each kill someone and what would the response be? It would be huge and it would be nation wide and it would cost millions at a min. Allowing permit holding to teachers to carry would cost nothing for the schools and make a huge difference in the safety of school children across the nation.
I don't think anyone disputes Cooper's first rule of gunfighting: Have a gun. The point is that if you are armed and caught in White or if you are unarmed for any reason, you don't just kneel down and allow the BG to put a round in your skull, you DO something, (almost) anything to survive and if possible, take out the BG. Flight 93 comes to mind. Granted, the BGs were not armed with guns but box cutters, but the point is that given the choice of "We're all going to die if we let them do what they want." vs. "Some of us may die, but if we take them out, some of us may live. Let's roll.", I'd like to think I'd choose the latter.
It's like your sig line says: To prevail, you must ACT!
I know you don't mean that only as an ad for a training business, so in what better context can it be applied?
Blessings,
B