-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Deadbeat dads! Pay your child support!
- Thread starter Que
- Start date
-
- Tags
- parental rights
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Bunnykid68
Grandmaster
Couldn't get the video to play. Is it truly as your title says it is?
All I can say is WOW.
I struggled with this same system attempting to raise my 3 boys from the 1st "X"
The system sucked then and apparently still does.
I struggled with this same system attempting to raise my 3 boys from the 1st "X"
The system sucked then and apparently still does.
femurphy77
Grandmaster
I wish I could say I was shocked but the system is so screwed up I believe anything is possible anymore!
I think a lot of people are checking it out right now. But, the guy did overpay and visit too much. I don't understand how he was not notified about changes to the court order, but that's the problem. I believe the reason for the sentencing is because he was found to be in contempt after getting upset and walking out of court. Still, the guy was doing the right thing and got hosed.
femurphy77
Grandmaster
I understand his anger. I have been in the hot seat even when I was up to speed on support.
Wow... As somebody that has dealt with this system, it sucks! Luckily I got custody of my daughter six years ago. My ex doesn't pay support, but I agreed to it, the little bit of extra money spent on groceries and such is worth it knowing my daughter is safe!
I fought for mine from day one. I could never get the court to let me have full custody until they turned 14 and had a strong say in where they lived. One at a time they came to us. I never pressed for support. The less I had to do with the "X" the better my life's quality. I chose poorly and those kids paid the price.
Fortunately I've never had these sort of problems with my ex, but this guy got truly F$$CKED by a corrupt and unjust system. I could understand how this guy could snap and take matters into his own hands. His baby mama is pure trash.
Same here church, same here. Mine was 7, her mom got nailed for DUI, I thought that was the perfect excuse. She didn't even take it to court to fight it! Personally, I'd have lost everything to lawyer fees before I would sign her over!
I'm not sure about the details, but it didn't even sound like the mother made this happen.
That is what won me the kids. The "X" and her idiot new husband were using me as a revenue stream. When the 1st kid was about to turn 14 she said we were going back to court and when she found out she would most likely loose it was determined it might be OK for the oldest to come and live with me. The idiot even complained they were having a hard time making it without that part of the support. I just shook my head. They were down one mouth to feed and clothe and still had problems......
When the youngest turned 14 they had no more reason to stick around as the well dried up so they moved to Florida.
The female most likely was the instigator in all of this at some level.
sounds like a couple winners! I wish mine would move several states away... Maybe North Korea?That is what won me the kids. The "X" and her idiot new husband were using me as a revenue stream. When the 1st kid was about to turn 14 she said we were going back to court and when she found out she would most likely loose it was determined it might be OK for the oldest to come and live with me. The idiot even complained they were having a hard time making it without that part of the support. I just shook my head. They were down one mouth to feed and clothe and still had problems......
When the youngest turned 14 they had no more reason to stick around as the well dried up so they moved to Florida.
Mine passed away some 10 years ago. Died of stupidity. Really, she did.
That headline is misleading, but the system need improvement.
I watched the story. First, he was behind in child support payments because he says he didn't know of the modification. Why? That's his attorney's or his job. Did the court not send out the order of modification? Did the court send it and the attorney and the attorney not notify him? Regardless of what the employer is doing regarding a garnishment, it's his responsibility to pay the correct amount or make sure the correct amount is paid. Yes, even if his employer screws up, it's still his responsibility.
So then, he finds out and pays off the deficit. Good for him. Seriously, that was the right thing to do. However, it apparently took the actions of the mother's attorney to bring that to his attention. That means he incurs attorney fees.
As for "overvisiting", he is either complying with the visitation or not. Not returning the child on time can cleverly be called "overvisiting", but it's violation of the custody order plain and simple and interference with the mother's custody.
Doesn't sound like a need for jail to me, but how many times had this "over-visiting" occurred? Had he been warned about it? How many times? There's history here.
...but I applaud the clever use of language by the attorney and advocates involved. Kudos.
I watched the story. First, he was behind in child support payments because he says he didn't know of the modification. Why? That's his attorney's or his job. Did the court not send out the order of modification? Did the court send it and the attorney and the attorney not notify him? Regardless of what the employer is doing regarding a garnishment, it's his responsibility to pay the correct amount or make sure the correct amount is paid. Yes, even if his employer screws up, it's still his responsibility.
So then, he finds out and pays off the deficit. Good for him. Seriously, that was the right thing to do. However, it apparently took the actions of the mother's attorney to bring that to his attention. That means he incurs attorney fees.
As for "overvisiting", he is either complying with the visitation or not. Not returning the child on time can cleverly be called "overvisiting", but it's violation of the custody order plain and simple and interference with the mother's custody.
Doesn't sound like a need for jail to me, but how many times had this "over-visiting" occurred? Had he been warned about it? How many times? There's history here.
...but I applaud the clever use of language by the attorney and advocates involved. Kudos.
I won't make any further comments at this point to keep myself from looking guilty if something were to happen
Site Supporter
Members online
- COOPADUP
- jspy5
- DDadams
- edwea
- Magyars
- shibumiseeker
- arpd2828
- Cavman
- TJ Kackowski
- KJQ6945
- Ruger_Ronin
- MarylandTacomaRider
- indyartisan
- 92FSTech
- kingpin75
- Glock22
- jwamplerusa
- Dutchmaster
- SouthernStar25
- snapping turtle
- Dean C.
- dboz
- HKFaninCarmel
- Slow Hand
- chuckp
- Creedmoor
- XDdreams
- red_zr24x4
- Tradesylver
- INgunowner
- fullmetaljesus
- Vince5693
- jsn_mooney
- Talkinghalls
- target64
- x34822
- Dirty Steve
- Steve
- mikek
- fender
- mike4sigs
- duff
- DoggyDaddy
- Midwestjimbo
- jbm1521
- williamsburg
- Nazgul
- indiucky
- slims2002
- iauffenberg
