Coronovirus III

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    Is there any difference in effectiveness of the different antibodies? In the typical duration they "hang out" in the body?

    Big variable. The IgX designations are type classifications of antibodies. The IgG type produced from the flu is different than the IgG type produced from the chinese virus. Each specific one will have its own life of effectiveness. So far nobody knows how long the IgG type antibodies from the chinese virus will last.
     

    dusty88

    Master
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 11, 2014
    3,179
    83
    United States
    So I just received a report of my employees collecting unemployment. I only cut 2 person's hours for 2 weeks then took them back to near normal. The person who was a part-time high school employee and only worked 8-14 hrs per week was eligible for unemployment because she is 18. The report showed her continuing to collect even after she was back at work, so I called Dept of Workforce Development. They said she's eligible for $250 per week total, more than she could have ever made here as a part time trainee while she was in school.

    Your tax dollars and inflation in action, I guess. It might also explain why her performance went down the tubes last week. She may want to get laid off completely? I don't know.
     

    jedi

    Da PinkFather
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    51   0   0
    Oct 27, 2008
    37,789
    113
    NWI, North of US-30
    So I just received a report of my employees collecting unemployment. I only cut 2 person's hours for 2 weeks then took them back to near normal. The person who was a part-time high school employee and only worked 8-14 hrs per week was eligible for unemployment because she is 18. The report showed her continuing to collect even after she was back at work, so I called Dept of Workforce Development. They said she's eligible for $250 per week total, more than she could have ever made here as a part time trainee while she was in school.

    Your tax dollars and inflation in action, I guess. It might also explain why her performance went down the tubes last week. She may want to get laid off completely? I don't know.

    Bingo!!! My sis best friend from high school is super happy and relaxed right now. She told my sis that they are MAKING more in unemployment + COVID19 benefits then when they were working. They dont have to leave their home, are getting paid and life is good. :faint:

    How can you be getting/earning more is beyond me. Something does not add up?
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,938
    113
    Mitchell
    Bingo!!! My sis best friend from high school is super happy and relaxed right now. She told my sis that they are MAKING more in unemployment + COVID19 benefits then when they were working. They dont have to leave their home, are getting paid and life is good. :faint:

    How can you be getting/earning more is beyond me. Something does not add up?

    Government calculus.
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,052
    113
    Government calculus.

    I would like to know who and how that language got inserted into the bill and their reasoning. I would also like to know which are my representatives and Senators voted for it. The last one should be easy to figure out by Google not sure Google would know all the ins and outs of the first.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,938
    113
    Mitchell
    I would like to know who and how that language got inserted into the bill and their reasoning. I would also like to know which are my representatives and Senators voted for it. The last one should be easy to figure out by Google not sure Google would know all the ins and outs of the first.

    I’m not sure. Wasn’t all of that as part of one or more of the CV stimulus bills? I think they all passed by wide, bi-partisan margins, didn’t they?
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,052
    113
    I’m not sure. Wasn’t all of that as part of one or more of the CV stimulus bills? I think they all passed by wide, bi-partisan margins, didn’t they?

    Yeah it was all part of the big stimulus bills they've been passing. Seems like government almost always gets it wrong and when they do anything quickly because they think it's an emergency they double down on how wrong they are
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    I think so. It was intended to give relief to those who could not work because of the effects of the chinese virus. I don't think they meant to create these situations where people made more for doing nothing.
    For every person you hear about that is making more this way there are probably many more who are making less than they would have and hopefully getting by.

    They are just re-proving once again that one size does NOT fit all.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    103,779
    149
    Southside Indy
    I think so. It was intended to give relief to those who could not work because of the effects of the chinese virus. I don't think they meant to create these situations where people made more for doing nothing.
    For every person you hear about that is making more this way there are probably many more who are making less than they would have and hopefully getting by.

    I think they absolutely meant to do it. Like the drug dealer saying, "The first hit is free." Get them used to getting by on government largesse and they have no incentive to get off it.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,938
    113
    Mitchell
    I think so. It was intended to give relief to those who could not work because of the effects of the chinese virus. I don't think they meant to create these situations where people made more for doing nothing.
    For every person you hear about that is making more this way there are probably many more who are making less than they would have and hopefully getting by.

    Oh I think they knew what they were doing. At least some of them. I remember seeing a clip of a democrat, when asked about folks getting (either getting money that were still working or making more than they were while working—I’m not sure now), he quipped “so what?”. (In so many words).
     

    Dead Duck

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    53   0   0
    Apr 1, 2011
    14,062
    113
    .
    Making a career out of getting fat and lazy at home..... AND actually getting a decent paycheck.

    What classes should I take to accomplish this? :dunno:
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    I think they absolutely meant to do it. Like the drug dealer saying, "The first hit is free." Get them used to getting by on government largesse and they have no incentive to get off it.

    That sure could be but I'm not as sure.
    Typically unemployment doesn't pay as much as a person made while working. It pays some fraction of that and varies by state. Because of the chinese virus situation they wanted to add some money to the unemployment amount. They settled on a flat amount of $600. Obviously this flat amount will be a higher percentage of the unemployment amount in some states than others and will be a higher percentage of the old wages for lower paid unemployed people than for higher paid unemployed people.
    I suppose they could have made it a percentage instead of a flat amount. Maybe they did want to encourage a welfare state and socialism.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    103,779
    149
    Southside Indy
    That sure could be but I'm not as sure.
    Typically unemployment doesn't pay as much as a person made while working. It pays some fraction of that and varies by state. Because of the chinese virus situation they wanted to add some money to the unemployment amount. They settled on a flat amount of $600. Obviously this flat amount will be a higher percentage of the unemployment amount in some states than others and will be a higher percentage of the old wages for lower paid unemployed people than for higher paid unemployed people.
    I suppose they could have made it a percentage instead of a flat amount. Maybe they did want to encourage a welfare state and socialism.

    Ain't no maybe about it in my opinion.
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,427
    149
    Earth
    That sure could be but I'm not as sure.
    Typically unemployment doesn't pay as much as a person made while working. It pays some fraction of that and varies by state. Because of the chinese virus situation they wanted to add some money to the unemployment amount. They settled on a flat amount of $600. Obviously this flat amount will be a higher percentage of the unemployment amount in some states than others and will be a higher percentage of the old wages for lower paid unemployed people than for higher paid unemployed people.
    I suppose they could have made it a percentage instead of a flat amount. Maybe they did want to encourage a welfare state and socialism.

    And where do you suppose that $600 number came from? :dunno:

    Could it possibly be that $600 ÷ 40 hours = $15 per hour that democrats have been clamoring for as a minimum wage?

    Nah. It couldn't be that. It must just be a total coincidence.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom