IDK, it seems to me that in some cases there should be a law: "Failure to act as a responsible adult!" It should be listed in the same area as "Failure to do right!"Guy behind the lady who was killed was hit by the bullet passthrough. Was hospitalized. Not sure if the second person is the second charge?
This is exactly what's going on.Looks like the prosecution gets to present both charges to the jury (if it gets that far), and the jury gets to decide which version of involuntary manslaughter to convict them of (if either).
Yeah, but he’s also got “I didn’t pull the trigger.”The Four Rules, not just for the range, but for life. Or, to avoid a Life sentence.
"Eet ain't low-dead" is never an optimal defense …
It is a less than optimal defense.Yeah, but he’s also got “I didn’t pull the trigger.”
That’s an ace in the hole if I ever saw one.
I doubt it. Baldwin is the one with the $$, not her.My guess is that Baldwin will get a lesser sentence than the armorer. I really see her part in this more as something that will end up in civil court.
Typical liberal lack of personal responsibility. “Its not my fault!” We all know the problem is the guns! People don’t kill people, guns do!Yeah, but he’s also got “I didn’t pull the trigger.”
That’s an ace in the hole if I ever saw one.
Maybe. But I would think that teeth would have a higher kill rate.People don’t kill people, gums do!
Saw that and fixed it, but pretty funny.Maybe. But I would think that teeth would have a higher kill rate.
Healthy teeth start with healthy gums though...Maybe. But I would think that teeth would have a higher kill rate.
"That's right Flo. And remember to floss before you brush. Your gums will thank you." -- Dr. GaryHealthy teeth start with healthy gums though...
Did you point a gun at a person? Did you pull the trigger? Did it fire? Did it kill the person? Depending on the laws, yes you would be arrested for a crime. Often negligence that results in a death is a crime.If the same thing happened to one of use at say a range. Would we be arrested for a crime.
There’s the kind of accident where it’s not a crime. But if you helped bring about the conditions that made the thing way more likely to end tragically, that doesn’t need a motive. But it does need a reason. The reason here is the dumbass pointed a gun that he did not know the status of at another person and pulled the trigger. It fired. She’s dead. If manslaughter includes gross negligence, he’s guilty. Lock the prick up.Reason matters a lot. People do not generally get convicted of accidents. The family should sue the pants off of the lot of them, but there should be some actual criminal intent to pursue criminal charges.
It will be interesting to see what they do down there.
That is not an accident. There was intent to ignore laws and codes which led to the outcome.I disagree.
There's the whole 'involuntary manslaughter' thing.
If a builder substitutes inferior building materials, and skips some steps on building a bridge over a river, and because of that the bridge collapses and people die... he did NOT intend to do harm. But his actions could (and did) lead to injury/death.
Drawing a gun on someone, pointing, and pulling a trigger.. could (and did) lead to injury/death.
He could have checked the gun, the ammo, had people go through the check with him, or asked for a non firing replica.
Also not an accident. The person killed would have been while committing another crime.How does a drunk driver then be charged with murder? His mental and physical faculties are impaired, but did he have the intent of killing an innocent person?
So already he got treated with kid gloves.Did you point a gun at a person? Did you pull the trigger? Did it fire? Did it kill the person? Depending on the laws, yes you would be arrested for a crime. Often negligence that results in a death is a crime.