ATF Agent Shot

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • HHollow

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 29, 2012
    275
    43
    News Article said: “Federal officials said one ATF agent was shot in the exchange and suffered a non-life-threatening wound.”

    There is always the small chance the AFT agent by another alphabet boy (or gal or ?).
     

    Mongo59

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jul 30, 2018
    4,471
    113
    Purgatory
    Am I the only one who would like to know what the headline would have read if the gunfire did not take place?

    Remember, they did this because it made sense to them, not to you. Their idea of what an "unlicensed dealer" is changes almost every day depending on what they want it to be. It is not a stretch of the imagination to realize this could soon apply to anyone who has ever sold a firearm.

    The ATF has become a government within the government as has the DOJ, FBI and the list grows. Non-elected officials determining and inflicting someone else's un-constitutional will on you while we all sit around like monkeys in the zoo arguing over when the next meal will be.

    Meanwhile, the elected officials sit around bickering about it until interest is lost and it becomes the status quo. This ratcheting effect is tightening a noose around our necks and most seem to be amazed at how well they can tie a knot...
     

    2tonic

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 14, 2011
    3,457
    97
    N.W. Disillusionment
    Just because he was making $250.00+ a year doesn't mean he wasn't living like he earned $350,000
    New math?
    No, translation: he had a 250,000 salary on the table, and made 100,000 under the table.
    Don't know what his wife did, she might have brought even more to the table. $100K flippin guns is flippin a whole lotta guns. That's on top of the probably 50-55 hours/week at his airport gig... and the time spent driving around bad neighborhoods in the company vehicle. Not that the surveillance observed him doing anything illegal or even suspicious while driving through the bad neighborhoods. Oh yeah, drove recklessly... like everyone else in Little Rock.
    There is no level of means which you can possess, that cannot be lived beyond.

    So the deceased made 250k, lived like he made 350k.
    Feds wanna know where the extra cake is coming from.
    If the government worked like it should, he would gave been having a "come to Jesus" meeting with the IRS. If they ascertained the source was firearm sales, legitimate or otherwise, then the ATF lads could arrange an afterwork get together to determine whether the legal parameters that apply had been violated.
    No raids, no shooting, no fatalities.
     

    Creedmoor

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Mar 10, 2022
    6,808
    113
    Madison Co Indiana
    There is no level of means which you can possess, that cannot be lived beyond.

    So the deceased made 250k, lived like he made 350k.
    Feds wanna know where the extra cake is coming from.
    If the government worked like it should, he would gave been having a "come to Jesus" meeting with the IRS. If they ascertained the source was firearm sales, legitimate or otherwise, then the ATF lads could arrange an afterwork get together to determine whether the legal parameters that apply had been violated.
    No raids, no shooting, no fatalities.
    I'm going to guess that early morning wasn't the first meeting those two had together.
     

    Sigblitz

    Grandmaster
    Trainer Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Aug 25, 2018
    14,605
    113
    Indianapolis
    Canada police receive a photograph of firearms from a confidential informant. Canada. Confidential informant. An investigative trace was made on serial numbers. Trace shows he bought multiple guns.

    Guy gets pulled over with marijuana. Gun is confiscated.

    Another guy gets pulled over with marijuana. Gun is confiscated.

    And a third with marijuana. Gun is confiscated. This one is prohibited. They try to get him to pinch the seller. Third guy says seller might consider a straw purchase, but no evidence of a straw buy in warrant.
    Mom let's them go through his phone, showing prohibited possessor bought a few more.

    Stolen gun confiscated during a shake down in Commifornia. It once went through the hands of the guy.

    Made undercover buys. Tailed him. Got his phone records. Tracked his car.

    This started with a photo in Canada. Why is that important to the warrant?
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,948
    77
    Camby area
    This started with a photo in Canada. Why is that important to the warrant?
    Because the gun serial traced back to the deceased. Which was one of many. :dunno:
    There is no level of means which you can possess, that cannot be lived beyond.

    So the deceased made 250k, lived like he made 350k.
    Feds wanna know where the extra cake is coming from.
    If the government worked like it should, he would gave been having a "come to Jesus" meeting with the IRS. If they ascertained the source was firearm sales, legitimate or otherwise, then the ATF lads could arrange an afterwork get together to determine whether the legal parameters that apply had been violated.
    No raids, no shooting, no fatalities.
    You mean nail him for tax evasion? Good enough for Capone!
     

    2tonic

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 14, 2011
    3,457
    97
    N.W. Disillusionment
    You mean nail him for tax evasion? Good enough for Capone!

    Well, what I really mean is that if the facts are that the subjects spending egregiously exceeds his income, and the suspicion is he dabbles in weapon sales, then that is indeed an IRS matter.

    If the T-men turn up evidence of "less than scrupulous" vetting of customers, then it becomes an ATF matter, and they can have a civilized, if still unexpected, meeting with the subject, without putting rounds downrange.
    Basically I'm saying someone screwed the pooch on this one.
     
    Top Bottom