Romney for President, 2012, baby.
I find this perplexing coming from someone who calls herself a conservative. And her first choice was gun-grabbing Chris Christie.
I don't get it. Others may have an explanation.
Ann Coulter: Romney for Pres, Cain VP
A conversation is already in progress:
I find this perplexing coming from someone who calls herself a conservative. And her first choice was gun-grabbing Chris Christie.
I don't get it. Others may have an explanation.
Ann Coulter: Romney for Pres, Cain VP
A conversation is already in progress:
On a side note, I came across an interesting explanation for why some have a certain disdain for Rambone in Ann Coulters new book. We are not use to seeing people who are totally devoted to a particular candidate, that is usually a pattern of behavior seen on the far left, not the right or center.
LOL... Ann Coulter would know about endorsing a wide variety of candidates... from gun-grabbing Chris Christie... and now Mitt Romney. She knows the left well -- she gives them endorsements.
Ann Coulter: Romney for Pres, Cain VP
If you actually listen to the whole clip it seems to me that she is basing her assessment on who she thinks has the most realistic chances of winning the nomination. And this all relates to the whole Ron Paul issue. Alot of people may agree with some of his message but they don't feel for whatever reason Paul can secure the nomination so if they still want to participate in the process they have to figure out and decide on which one of the other candidates that they have to choose from. She did'nt get the candidate that she wanted so that is exactly what she is doing now.
That's the functional equivalent of hating liberty and siding with the fascist-socialists.
Practical reality has no place in politics. We all must ignore human behavior and historical results as well.
She has at least 9 candidates to endorse for and she picks the absolute worst one because he's "realistic" according to the TV. There's an Establishment cheerleader if I ever saw one.
She picked the worst one according to your opinion. She did'nt just get on there and blindly endorse Romney.To me she was more giving out her analisys and observations on how she felt the field played out. She actually gave some reasons why and pointed out why she felt other candidates could'nt get the nomination. In her opinion she felt Perry could'nt get it because of the whole immigration issue and she even pointed out why she felt Cain was'nt a viable candidate because of a lack of any government experience. All legit reasons. I'm sure if Ron Paul were in a strong position to win the nomination while being able to appeal to enough democrats and independents then she ultimately would not have a problem backing his candidacy. As it stands now RP can't even get enough republicans behind him. It all boils down to electability in the end.