Ann Coulter endorses Mitt Romney for President

[UncleMike]

Okay rambone you win. You've finally gotten your proof that Ann Coulter endorses Mitt Romney. I won't even try to verify the context in which she said it and the reason why. You have bested us once again. I was'nt gonna vote for Ann Coulter anyway. Now What?

Sounds like Seppuku is your only option.

 

[rambone]

Her endorsement--if you can call it that--of Romney is a qualified one, based not on his politics, principles, or platform but on the simple fact that she thinks he's the only one that can beat Obama.

What's the problem?

I think she's horribly mistaken and I hope people don't actually believe that. Romney would get destroyed in a General. He's another McCain. Republicans already did this. Her point is met by my counter point.

And in tonight's interview she implied that Romney is "conservative" in the context of the discussion. Eeech. I try to believe there is some difference between the terms "conservative" and "Republican." But Coulter and Hannity giving a giant pass to Romney really does the (real) conservative movement a disservice. I feel like if Karl Marx was the Republican front runner, these two would rally the troops for him. Their standards are exceptionally low. I hope people can tell.

Now What?

Once your trust in the "right-wing" talk/media has been sufficiently shattered you can help me shake up the rest of the dittoheads.

If pushing for Romney isn't enough of a clue, then how about using the blatant non-coverage of pivotal information as an example:

There is no excuse for the so-called Conservatives in media to be hiding the fact that most of the GOP candidates are not even conservative. I asked my parents (who are avid Fox News watchers) if they knew of any candidates who supported bailouts... like the kind of bailouts that we were all protesting at the Tea Party rallies together. They didn't know of any. They were surprised to hear that Cain, Gingrich, Romney, Perry, & Huntsman all supported the TARP bailouts. They watch hours of FOX News every day, and somehow these kinds of pertinent details don't ever seem to come up in conversation between all these astute analysts and pundits, like Coulter and Hannity. Its brainwashing, I tell ya. These pundits aren't analyzing anything but the Establishment's script of things they are instructed to talk about on cue.

 

[88GT]

I think she's horribly mistaken and I hope people don't actually believe that. Romney would get destroyed in a General. He's another McCain. Republicans already did this. Her point is met by my counter point.

I do too, but that's tangential to the claim you were making.

I asked my parents (who are avid Fox News watchers) if they knew of any candidates who supported bailouts... like the kind of bailouts that we were all protesting at the Tea Party rallies together. They didn't know of any. They were surprised to hear that Cain, Gingrich, Romney, Perry, & Huntsman all supported the TARP bailouts. They watch hours of FOX News every day, and somehow these kinds of pertinent details don't ever seem to come up in conversation between all these astute analysts and pundits, like Coulter and Hannity. Its brainwashing, I tell ya. These pundits aren't analyzing anything but the Establishment's script of things they are instructed to talk about on cue.

Honestly, I blame your parents. The information is out there. If they are too lazy/ignorant/disinterested/loyal/apathetic/whatever to seek it out for themselves, they have only themselves to blame.

 

[KG1]

Once your trust in the "right-wing" talk/media has been sufficiently shattered you can help me shake up the rest of the dittoheads.

There you go making assumptions again. I've already stated that i'm not a big Romney fan and I don't get hung up on Ann Coulter's opinions or who she endorses or what her motivation is for doing so. I already know why she does what she does. I've figured it out all on my own and I take it for what it is. Also for the record I don't even watch or listen to the "right-wing" talk/media. I do my own research and I never take anything at face value. That's why I alway's strongly advocate that someone should verify independently anything posted by anyone on an internet forum. Then and only then should they form thier own opinion.

 

[rambone]

Honestly, I blame your parents. The information is out there. If they are too lazy/ignorant/disinterested/loyal/apathetic/whatever to seek it out for themselves, they have only themselves to blame.

Sure, well it is their fault. Same as the rest of the country who lets these agenda-driven media types permeate their ears for hours upon end. We seem to be in agreement, and there should be no issue with me calling out the media moguls whom millions of people take as gospel. Their agenda is not truth. Most viewers actually believe that they are being told the truth and they are informed. This is a big problem.

 

[rambone]

There you go making assumptions again.

I didn't, I haven't, and I will try harder to not appear to next time.

 

[88GT]

Sure, well it is their fault. Same as the rest of the country who lets these agenda-driven media types permeate their ears for hours upon end. We seem to be in agreement, and there should be no issue with me calling out the media moguls whom millions of people take as gospel. Their agenda is not truth. Most viewers actually believe that they are being told the truth and they are informed. This is a big problem.

But I do have one when you present your argument in a way that points the finger at them and not the public.

If you're lambasting them for their immorality or questionable ethics, fine. Have at 'em. But if you want me to hold the media responsible for the ignorance of the people, I will not join that party.

Who's responsible for someone being fat? The person who made foolish dietary choices or the food manufacturer who made the the food?

Same thing here. No sympathy for anyone who isn't proactive enough to do their own homework.

 

[rambone]

But I do have one when you present your argument in a way that points the finger at them and not the public.

If you're lambasting them for their immorality or questionable ethics, fine. Have at 'em. But if you want me to hold the media responsible for the ignorance of the people, I will not join that party.

Who's responsible for someone being fat? The person who made foolish dietary choices or the food manufacturer who made the the food?

Same thing here. No sympathy for anyone who isn't proactive enough to do their own homework.

The same could be said about those who govern us. They are more of a symptom than a cause. Who's to blame when we elect people who have been on record for bailouts/gun grabbing/etc? Its our fault for electing them, when their record was plain to see. And that's in agreement with what you said.

People, the media, the government... none should get a pass.

 

[88GT]

The same could be said about those who govern us. They are more of a symptom than a cause. Who's to blame when we elect people who have been on record for bailouts/gun grabbing/etc? Its our fault for electing them, when their record was plain to see. And that's in agreement with what you said.

People, the media, the government... none should get a pass.

Imagine that. I've done exactly that. It's kinda why I keep going back to the electorate when we discuss things.

 

[rambone]

If Not Romney, Who? If Not Now, When? -- Ann Coulter

 

[rambone]

Coulter: Romney is "by far the most conservative" candidate

"What I'm saying now is: of the available candidates, Romney is by far the most conservative, tied with Michelle Bachmann, and he has a proven ability to win in a state like Massachusetts." -- Ann Coulter, 12/13/2011

And of course Sean Hannity says that everybody would be a good president except Ron Paul:

"I think Romney would be a good president. But I also think that Gingrich, Bachmann, Santorum... everybody but Ron Paul would be a good president." -- Sean Hannity, 12/13/2011


LOL. Shills gonna shill.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXvdJW1yeHg"]www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXvdJW1yeHg[/ame]

 

[rambone]

Coulter: Mitt Romney is the only candidate right on the most important issues

Only One Candidate is Right on the Two Most Important Issues | Ann Coulter

Guess what the most important issues are... Obamacare and Illegal Immigration. And Mitt Romney is the strongest opponent of O'Romneycare. righhtt...




New reason to doubt Romney would repeal Obamacare

See Mitt Romney say his health care reform plan would be good for the nation


Mitt: "Let's repeal the bad and keep the good."
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XI5JjBHq8_0[/ame]

 

[rambone]

Ann Coulter: "There are no more Rockefeller Republicans left"

Ann Coulter: There are no more Rockefeller Republicans; Mitt Romney is most conservative (CPAC 2012)

BWAHAHAHAHA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcL_-rQ4PLM

 

[rambone]

Romney is "biggest outsider and most conservative candidate" since Reagan

Ann Coulter - February 22, 2012 - WHAT'S THEIR PROBLEM WITH ROMNEY?

Unlike actual Establishment candidates, Romney has never worked in Washington, much less spent his entire life as a professional politician. He's had a Midas touch with every enterprise he has ever run, including Bain Capital, the Olympics and Massachusetts.

The chestnut about Mitt Romney being pushed on unsuspecting conservatives by "the Establishment" is the exact opposite of the truth. The Establishment, by any sensible definition, is virulently opposed to Romney -- and for completely contradictory reasons.

Ms. Coulter must not think that Wall Street participates in politics. LOL

Yeah those guys at Goldman Sachs are sure shaking in their booties. Giving Mitt wheelbarrows full of money.

"Please Mitt... don't give us more bailouts!"

But instead of popping Champagne corks over our final triumph over Rockefeller Republicanism, some conservatives are still fighting old wars, rather like an old cold warrior prattling about the Soviet Union after the rest of us have moved onto the war on terrorism.

Rockefeller Republicanism is now the vast majority of Republicanism.

Meanwhile, Romney cheerfully campaigns on, the biggest outsider and most conservative candidate we've run for president since Reagan, while being denounced by the Establishment as "too Establishment."

BWAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Ms. Coulter must not think that Wall Street participates in politics

Incorrect, she has written extensively on the nexus between Wall Street and the Democrat Party.

Yeah those guys at Goldman Sachs are sure shaking in their booties. Giving Mitt wheelbarrows full of money.

"Please Mitt... don't give us more bailouts!"

What bailout did Mitt Romney give Goldman Sachs? I was unaware he was in a position to do so.

Rockefeller Republicanism is now the vast majority of Republicanism.

What Rockefeller positions do any of the Republican candidates for President espouse?

 

[rambone]

Ms. Coulter must not think that Wall Street participates in politics

Incorrect, she has written extensively on the nexus between Wall Street and the Democrat Party.

So Coulter is aware of Wall Street running Washington politics but she chooses to only see it as a partisan Democrat phenomenon.

She is either delusional or lying.

Romney has both been a recipient and an advocate of Federal Wall Street bailouts.

What bailout did Mitt Romney give Goldman Sachs? I was unaware he was in a position to do so.

Romney didn't give it. He supported it. His obvious cronyism and banking connections has made him a Goldman Sachs favorite.

Romney has sent a clear message to the bankers that if they want more bailouts, he's their guy. As far as I know, he's never flip-flopped on his pro-bailout position. And the big banks have been rewarding him handsomely with campaign contributions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZM9u2B7DG4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNxslGdBf74

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGMo1e--_Co

What Rockefeller positions do any of the Republican candidates for President espouse?

Geez. That's an easy one.

Let's start with Newt Gingrich, who was a State Chairman in Georgia for Nelson Rockefeller in 1968. I think that solidly qualifies him as a Rockefeller Republican.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJQsLFhuyOY


This is how Wikipedia defines "Rockefeller Republican".

Rockefeller Republican (often termed "moderate Republican") refers to a faction of the United States Republican Party who held moderate to liberal views similar to those of Nelson Rockefeller. The term largely fell out of use by the end of the twentieth century, and has been replaced by the term "moderate Republican." Modern Rockefeller Republicans are typically center-right, reject far-right policies, and are culturally liberal. Many espouse government and private investments in environmentalism, healthcare and higher education as necessities for the nation's growth, in the tradition of Nelson Rockefeller, Alexander Hamilton and Theodore Roosevelt. In general, Rockefeller Republicans oppose socialism and the redistribution of wealth while supporting some pragmatic regulation of business and federal social programs in matters pertaining to the public good. They represent a diversity of views on foreign policy, but historically most were considered "hawks" against communism and strong supporters of American business abroad. Richard Nixon -- a moderate, establishment Republican within the Party's contemporary ideological framework—founded the Environmental Protection Agency, cooled tensions with China and the Soviet Union, and in 1971 announced he was a Keynesian. Rockefeller Republicans were very common in the New England, West Coast, and the Middle Atlantic States, where there historically existed larger liberal constituencies.
​

Aside from Gingrich, who who else among the candidates is a hawkish, environmentalist, globalist, gun controlling, government health care advocate?

Why, that would be Mitt Romney.

Not to mention that Nelson Rockefeller was a close family friend to the Romneys and political ally to George Romney.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-aCwD83Csk

I'd say we have a loooooooong way to go before the "Rockefeller Republicans" are out of the party.

 

[level.eleven]

Why does Coulter ignore the mountains of corporate welfare that Bain has received?

 

[Boiled Owl]

Coincidence: Sachs manages the Romney fortune. (Not that I fault the guy for being rich)
Here's hoping we can return to another incestuous sachs/bush style govenment.