After Binghamton, Questions Linger About Easy Access to Guns

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 4sarge

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 19, 2008
    5,897
    99
    FREEDONIA
    After Binghamton, Questions Linger About Easy Access to Guns - ABC News

    After Binghamton, Questions Linger About Easy Access to Guns

    Battle Over Access to Guns Renews After Shootings in New York, Pennsylvania

    Purchasing a Gun, No Questions Asked

    In the last month, seven U.S. shootings have killed 48 people

    As the nation gets a clearer picture of two killers who have made headlines in recent days -- one near Pittsburgh, one in Binghamton, N.Y. -- some are wondering whether Americans have too much access to guns.

    Watch the "20/20" special on "If I Only Had a Gun" Friday at 10 p.m. ET

    This morning, Shirley DeLucia is recovering from gunshot wounds in a New York hospital. Hailed as one of the heroes of Friday's massacre in Binghamton, DeLucia called police after being shot along with another receptionist who was killed.

    Doctors say she should make a full physical recovery, but her brother, Lyle Fasset, said the emotional impact could take its toll for a long time to come.

    "I think she's going to have a few problems," he said, adding that she worried about paying the bills the last time he visited her in the hospital.

    As the gunman, identified as 41-year-old Jiverly Voong, blasted his way through the American Civic Association, DeLucia, 61, stayed on the phone for 38 minutes, guiding police and trying to provide them with information to prevent more people from being shot. Voong killed 13 people before turning the gun on himself.

    Related
    Gun Sales Up in Binghamton, Across U.S.

    Urinating Dog Sparked Cop-Killing 'Battle'

    Hazy Picture of Gunman Emerges


    "We're always there for her," Fasset said. "Chances are she's not going to ask for help. That's the kind of person she is."

    On Saturday, one day after the Binghamton shootings, three Pittsburgh-area police officers were gunned down after responding to what they thought was a domestic disturbance call. Richard Poplawski, 23, the alleged shooter, was shot several times in the leg.
    Police responded after his mother called 911 concerning an argument over a urinating dog. When the first two officers arrived, she opened the door, not knowing her son was standing behind her with an AK-47 assault-style rifle.
    Police say he also had a .22-caliber rifle and a revolver and was wearing a bulletproof vest.

    His close friend told ABC News that Poplawski had long feared losing his right to own guns.
    "They were all legal," his friend Edward Perkovic said of the weapons. "He had about four guns. I've been in houses where they have gun cases with 20 guns. He had a small, small amount of guns."

    "We have 32 people being murdered by guns every day in this country," said Michael Wolkowitz, a board member of the Brady Center, which lobbies for tighter gun restrictions. "If peanut butter or pistachio nuts or spinach killed that number of people once in one day, they'd be pulled by the [Food and Drug Administration]."


    ap_shootings_090405_mn.jpg


    Mourners pay tribute to shooting victims killed in separate massacres over the weekend. Some are concerned that firearm loopholes allow easy access to guns.
    (AP Photos)


    Investigators believe Voong was an isolated man who couldn't find work. Authorities said that people had been making fun of him and his inability to speak English and that he had made weekly visits to a gun range.

    While the Constitution protects Americans' right to own guns, do laws make it too easy for potentially dangerous people to own firearms?

    This weekend's mass shootings come nearly two years after the massacre at Virginia Tech and two years after the Virginia governor and authorities urged lawmakers to close what's called the gun show "loophole," where customers can buy guns, no questions asked.

    Related


    'We Are Stricken With Grief': 14 Dead in N.Y. Shooting Spree




    For more than a year, ABC News has followed Omar Samaha, whose sister, Reema, was among the students killed at Virginia Tech. His quest now is to keep authorities to their word.

    When ABC News traveled with Samaha to a gun show in Richmond, Va., he had about $5,000 in cash and one hour to see what he could buy.

    He was approached by a seller before he even made it inside the door. Samaha was able to buy a gun -- a Glock-- no questions asked.
    It was a purchase that chilled him. It was the same kind of gun used to kill his sister and 31 others at Virginia Tech.
    Private sellers at gun shows in Virginia are not required to conduct background checks. It's a loophole that exists in 33 states.

    Gun rights groups argue that the Virginia Tech shooter bought his weapons at a gun shop, not at a show, and that they shouldn't be held responsible for background checks that didn't work.

    They say their privacy rights -- and business -- could be hurt, if the loophole is closed.
     
    Last edited:

    dross

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2009
    8,699
    48
    Monument, CO
    "We have 32 people being murdered by guns every day in this country," said Michael Wolkowitz, a board member of the Brady Center, which lobbies for tighter gun restrictions. "If peanut butter or pistachio nuts or spinach killed that number of people once in one day, they'd be pulled by the [Food and Drug Administration]."

    The analogy is so false it shouldn't even have to be rebutted. If the guns had gone off on their own and killed those people, I'd be all for a recall.

    If, however, someone was bludgeoning people with sacks of pistachio nuts, or braining people with cans of spinach, I wouldn't assume a recall would help much.
     

    waloidian

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2008
    465
    16
    Bloomingtonian
    "We have 32 people being murdered by guns every day in this country," said Michael Wolkowitz, a board member of the Brady Center, which lobbies for tighter gun restrictions. "If peanut butter or pistachio nuts or spinach killed that number of people once in one day, they'd be pulled by the [Food and Drug Administration]."

    The analogy is so false it shouldn't even have to be rebutted. If the guns had gone off on their own and killed those people, I'd be all for a recall.

    If, however, someone was bludgeoning people with sacks of pistachio nuts, or braining people with cans of spinach, I wouldn't assume a recall would help much.
    :yesway: I know it isnt a laughing matter, but those are great analogies, right in line with the spiel from the Brady Bunch
     

    Windwalker

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 20, 2008
    111
    16
    Mr. Wolkowitz, as both you and the other board members of the Brady Center know, we do not have 32 people being murdered by guns every day in this Country. We have these people being murdered by OTHER PEOPLE committing felony criminal acts of murder. Whether this criminal uses a gun, knife, club, or automobile to kill his victim or victims, it is not the tool used that kills them. It is the criminal who used the tool that killed the victims.
    We have laws in place to prosecute these criminals. We need more enforcement and more prosecution of these laws to get these criminals off the streets.
     
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 17, 2009
    934
    18
    Dyer
    Guns kill 32 people a day, huh?

    You know what this tells me? We have to ban automobiles. They are a drain on government resources and they kill 118 people every day.

    Next we have to ban fast food. Fast food causes diabetes and diabetes kills 389 people every day.

    While we are at it we should just euthanize people over the age of 65. Did you know that 4,931 people over the age of 65 die every day? Why let them live, they are a hindrance to the people who are able to work? They are eventually going to die anyway.

    Maybe we could put all of the people over the age of 65 in a car at a McDonalds drive-thru. When they get to the window we will just use a high-powered "assault-style" AK-47 with a detachable high-capacity magazineto kill them.
     

    Bigum1969

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2008
    21,422
    38
    SW Indiana
    Guns kill 32 people a day, huh?

    You know what this tells me? We have to ban automobiles. They are a drain on government resources and they kill 118 people every day.

    Next we have to ban fast food. Fast food causes diabetes and diabetes kills 389 people every day.

    While we are at it we should just euthanize people over the age of 65. Did you know that 4,931 people over the age of 65 die every day? Why let them live, they are a hindrance to the people who are able to work? They are eventually going to die anyway.

    Maybe we could put all of the people over the age of 65 in a car at a McDonalds drive-thru. When they get to the window we will just use a high-powered "assault-style" AK-47 with a detachable high-capacity magazineto kill them.

    Great post. Reps to ya :yesway:
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    Not to mention.... but 32 people a day? That's 11,680/yr. I'll give them credit for the fact that they understated the number of murders, rather than trying to overstate by including suicides and accidents. However...

    Of those 11,680, how many are committed by one gang-banger on another? How many are drug related? And conversely, how many are committed by people who will follow any laws written, vs. by people who will ignore whatever law they choose to ignore?

    :dunno: :twocents:

    Blessings,
    Bill
     
    Top Bottom