So, after the AR incident. was the handgun legally possessed by Tipton?
I believe so, iirc the charges were dropped.
So, after the AR incident. was the handgun legally possessed by Tipton?
Why keep saying it if you can't rationally defend it? It's a non sequitur response to negligence.
Your burden, not mine.
All guns are always loaded. Can I even say that here?
"Nonsense. He failed to treat a gun like a gun."
...It would be far better to discuss the problems related to improper transportation of firearms than pull out a logical fallacy.
Wouldn't the NRA's three rules be more germane?
Zurlon wasn't much for the Four Rules either.
Zurlon wasn't much for the Four Rules either.
He also said, "eet ain't low-dead" right before he punched a hole in himself.
How does one "follow" your screwy rule any better than keeping them loaded at all times?
How about we start by not waving them about--the parking lot, the range, the gun store, etc.--like toys, because, you know, they are loaded, just so we mitigate some internal hang up with the Four Rules that we have?
Well yeah on both my friend.....as I am.....
But safety.....always safety. Never bag a gun chambered.
No burden to me, you're the one who sounds ridiculous.
"Oh, look, another negligent discharge. So easily preventable."
"ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED!"
"What are you talking about? Of course it was loaded, it discharged. The problem was unsafe handling, negligently discharging a gun in an unsafe direction."
"BUT ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED WOULD HAVE KEPT HIM SAFE! BLATANT REFUSAL TO CONCEPTUALIZE!!!"
"Nonsense. He failed to treat a gun like a gun."
"..."
"I thought so."
It's unfathomable why making probably the most concise statement regarding gun safety could possibly be a point of argument, but there it is.
For a more detailed explanation of my argument, see this recent thread: https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...hop-owner-killed-ccw-class-2.html#post6596844
I trust you will find it quite fathomable.