I'm sure combatvet would be out in the workforce earning his own keep had he not been wounded serving us.
It's in my 6 year plan to be back working as long as the Doc's OK it.
I'm sure combatvet would be out in the workforce earning his own keep had he not been wounded serving us.
It's in my 6 year plan to be back working as long as the Doc's OK it.
God bless you! And thank you for your service! I was in but was fortunate not to have to go to combat. If the government messes you up then we have an obligation to make you as whole as we possibly can and provide for you when you can't be made whole again.
first of all, look at the context of the post. He is replying to a disabled vet who feels guilty about filing for eitc when he has paid $0 in federal income taxes. Notice he doesn't feel entitled to it. If you left part of yourself on the battlefield, I think most of us would be more than happy to pay for your eitc. I'm sure combatvet would be out in the workforce earning his own keep had he not been wounded serving us.
When do you leave for basic training.
Ditto to that. No wounded soldier should ever left in need. As long as they live.
So people who have paid into the system all their life and have even owed money don't deserve a break? How does that work? Also, if it's there, why not use it? As long as you're not milking the system and not doing it every year or whatever, I don't see a single problem with it. Now, for some dead beat crack head that's never paid into the system that's a different story. However, you seem to think it's not ok for ANYONE EVER to do it. But yet you make an exception here. So that makes you no more a hypocrite than I.
Oh, as far as basic, I'm hoping soon. It depends on what the recruiter says this week. I'm just waiting on word if I can enlist or not.
Amen to that.
I've been a taxpayer for 17 years now and never once received eitc.
If you think you're bitter now, wait until you do get old.Btw, I may be bitter but I'm not old.
If you think you're bitter now, wait until you do get old.
Mike
Those were 2006 numbers. My understanding is that under the recent laws the number will go over 50%.
A scarier number to me is that the top 1% pays 40% of the income taxes. Think of it. Full half the country pays none, and 1% pays almost half. Half the people don't care about taxes because they don't pay any, and another solid percentage pays a reasonable amount. Who cares about the few who foot most of the bill? In fact, I think they're commonly known as "those who don't pay their fair share."
Um, friend, income taxes don't go toward operating expenditures. Income taxes are applied to debt service.
I'm not sure what point you're making.
In each year's budget the government allocates an amount. That amount includes the year's operating expenses, which includes actual operating expenses, as well as interest on the debt.
Each year we spend more than we take in. This amount, called the deficit, adds to the total debt.
What does this have to do with the fairness of half the country paying nothing, 1% of the country paying 40% of collected revenues, and 10% of the country paying 70%?
The point being made is this: all government services and projects are paid for with an interest-only home equity loan against the country. Income taxes go to make minimum interest payments on that loan.