If you ain't reached out to your Senator on SB 28... it's a good time to do it.ISRPA members saw this in their inbox yesterday. Whoever this new Co-Director of Government Affairs dude is... it looks like he copied and pasted post #388
SB 28 Scheduled for Hearing 0830 Wednesday January 31
-CONTACT YOUR SENATOR-
SB 28 Discriminatory financial services practices (authored by Jim Tomes) is up for a hearing on Wednesday 31 January, 0830, Room 130 in the Insurance and Financial Institutions Committee. It is very similar to HB 1084, but broader in scope.
The 2A Project explains more: SB28 is our latest attempt to prevent discrimination against businesses or individuals based on their involvement in 2A-related activities or sales. But it is broader than that - it also prevents discrimination based on a "social credit score" that can penalize people or businesses based on their involvement with fossil fuels or their use (or non-use) of affirmative action considerations in hiring or "diversity, equity and inclusion" programs in the workplace. If you can spare some time on Wednesday morning, please consider coming down to the Statehouse and supporting SB28!
FIND YOUR SENATOR: CLICK HERE
Indiana General Assembly: CLICK HERE
Below is a draft email you can use to contact your Senator:
Senator,
I am reaching out to encourage your support for Senate Bill 28, Discriminatory Financial Services Practices. This bill was authored by Senator Tomes.
There are countless examples of banks and payment processors discriminating against law-abiding citizens, businesses, and industries because of activities that are legal and constitutionally protected.
Large banks including Citibank have discriminated against firearms retailers, manufacturers and other firearms-related businesses including training. A JP Morgan/Chase-owned payment processor refused service based solely on the political affiliation of a guest speaker. The North Dakota coal industry has had significant problems maintaining insurance due to Environmental Social Governance (ESG) scores.
SB 28 codifies Social Credit Scores, and allows Hoosiers to take legal action when discrimination occurs. Social Credit Scores were developed by the Chinese Communist Party to control the population. Such activity is abhorrent to freedom-loving Americans, but seen as an opportunity to eliminate dissent by those in charge of financial service providers.
I know I can count on your support of this vital legislation.
Thank you,
Name
Address
Phone
I'm not sure on this (SB 180 does look interesting as much as I hate to say) but this could be an effort to get everyone behind HB 1084. From speaking to someone on it this evening 1084 is a more narrow focus and accomplishes much the same things.I saw that, gave me a laugh.
Ahh well. SB 28 tomorrow.. different cast of characters. Room 130.
Interestingly SB 180 goes first tomorrow, then SB 28
Tomorrow's notes say "Testimony Only"
View attachment 329406
You may be right. We will see. I know that if the senate and house manage to pass conflicting or duplicate bills it can start some messy processes. Now I realize the SB is more wide ranging bill, but its going to conflict with the House Bill if both were passed. because of the short Indiana sessions they tend to avoid it like the plague.I'm not sure on this (SB 180 does look interesting as much as I hate to say) but this could be an effort to get everyone behind HB 1084. From speaking to someone on it this evening 1084 is a more narrow focus and accomplishes much the same things.
Senator Baldwin is the Senate sponsor of 1084, and he is also the Committee Chair of Insurance and Financial Institutions. Coincidence? I don't believe in coincidence.
Vote early, vote often! Or is that ePrey?Probably because I emailed mine twice.
Mooting it with SB 28 while holding HB 1084 in reserve until SB 28 passes the House could be a strategy.You may be right. We will see. I know that if the senate and house manage to pass conflicting or duplicate bills it can start some messy processes. Now I realize the SB is more wide ranging bill, but its going to conflict with the House Bill if both were passed. because of the short Indiana sessions they tend to avoid it like the plague.
At list point it may be more expedient to amend the passed house bill with the stuff from SB 28 and then go to a conference committee. Or ignore HB 1084 and go for the big score with SB 28. Which maybe more expedient.