Jaybird1980
Grandmaster
I have sent 17 messages plus phone calls. This is the only response I've ever received from himI replied to him on the database...no reply yet.
I have sent 17 messages plus phone calls. This is the only response I've ever received from himI replied to him on the database...no reply yet.
Database is the words of NAGR, led by shakedown artist Dudley Brown. Process addresses access to information that exists. We're not re-inventing the wheel here, don't act like it.
The dumbass senator doesn't even know that Indiana doesn't have "concealed carry permits"? Why am I not surprised?
Shows his ignorance and that he could care diddly squat about it.The dumbass senator doesn't even know that Indiana doesn't have "concealed carry permits"? Why am I not surprised?
The dumbass senator doesn't even know that Indiana doesn't have "concealed carry permits"? Why am I not surprised?
Concealed carry permit/LTCH.... this is small potatoes. Words do have meanings, of course, but if someone ask what kind of car you drive and the answer is F-150 (or Silverado or Ram or Jeep) you’re just going to answer the question, not make him look/her ask “what kind of truck/what kind of Jeep/what kind of vehicle, first.Shows his ignorance and that he could care diddly squat about it.
If he cared and was a proud supporter of the 2nd Amendment and actually had a carry license he would have referred to it as a LTCH.
I do believe I heard officers testify in hearings that this is the protocol. Until the officer identifies who they are interacting with, they have no way to know or find out if that person is a felon or not......... Add that to the fact that unless I’m misinformed, officers approach EVERY car with the idea that the driver might be armed, so knowing prohibited status is not something I’d expect to change much in the way of officer safety—I am willing to change my mind on that, given good reason to do so.
I disagree. A Senator should know the statutes he is asked to create, amend, or eliminate. We're not talking about Joe Blow on the street or your next-door neighbor. We're talking about someone making false claims about proposed legislation, while also mis-stating a fundamental nature of existing law.Concealed carry permit/LTCH.... this is small potatoes. Words do have meanings, of course, but if someone ask what kind of car you drive and the answer is F-150 (or Silverado or Ram or Jeep) you’re just going to answer the question, not make him look/her ask “what kind of truck/what kind of Jeep/what kind of vehicle, first.
lf we really want to cover all of them, we would have to say “government-issued and unConstitutional permission slip to exercise a natural and God-given right” but GIAUPSTEANAGGR is a little long winded.
I’m willing to give him a pass on “CCW permit”.
The rest, not so much. We HAVE a database listing former felons and domestic batterers who are prohibited. Making a database to list people’s mental health seems to violate hipaa. Add that to the fact that unless I’m misinformed, officers approach EVERY car with the idea that the driver might be armed, so knowing prohibited status is not something I’d expect to change much in the way of officer safety—I am willing to change my mind on that, given good reason to do so.
Further, if the bill was lacking something, hear and amend it. Bray and Brown act like it was just an up/down vote as passed by the House.... and they are fooling no one who is paying any attention. Primary their sorry butts back to obscurity in ignominy!
Blessings,
Bill
Ok, it took me some time to write up a response. Every time I started I would get frustrated and go off on a rant. Let me know what you think, I'm sure I've missed something or misspoke somewhere.
You're free to disagree, of course. That doesn't change the fact that the rest of my point ("car" vs pickup vs van vs jeep vs whatever) holds true. He used a general term for an object, and we all knew what he meant. As I said, words have meanings, but the use of general term is not exclusive of any member of the set. If we want to include clips and magazines and for that matter, belts, in a single descriptive term, we could say "Ammunition feeding device".... which most people would just say clips (going on current practice) and many of us would probably generalize unless specificity was required, to "mags". "Ammunition feeding device" is kind of an unwieldy term. Too, this particular politician was talking to a reporter.... How many of THEM are going to know LTCH? Most of them probably think that you need a permit to buy a gun, think that there's a training requirement, that guns aren't allowed in banks or bars, and think that criminals obey laws. Didn't Mr. Freeman create a "law" that says if it's the law in Texas, it's the law everywhere, meaning that they heard a law exists SOMEwhere, so they think it's for them, too.I disagree. A Senator should know the statutes he is asked to create, amend, or eliminate. We're not talking about Joe Blow on the street or your next-door neighbor. We're talking about someone making false claims about proposed legislation, while also mis-stating a fundamental nature of existing law.