Russia vs. Ukraine Part 2

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana
    I looked at the second one and expected to see the familiar Babylon Bee logo.
    That is from last April. That is why I posted the 196 billion(Foxnews article). It is not just military and humanitarian aid we send. We have also paid IMF loans Ukraine owes in addition to things like pensions. That sum does not include the billions we spent before January of 2022.


    An Obama era fact sheet. It does not include money from the council on foreign relations and we did end up paying the loan guarantees to the IMF(2 billion) way back in 2015.

    Ukraine GDP averaged 98.23 USD Billion from 1987 until 2021
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,446
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Why does he want to take money from our pockets to put money in their pockets? I can see wanting to help a nation keep its sovereignty and fight aggressors trying to take it. But this is going far beyond that mission.

    Again I ask the people who favor this, do you have a limit? Is there no number too high, or no end to your willingness to sacrifice other people’s resources.

    What’s next? We gonna help Ukrainian parents fund their kids’ college? Maybe we should buy them all electric cars. Ukrainians must like to vacation. Won't you support sending them money to take a cruise? No? You ****ing bigots. How heartless of you not to spend your own children’s future on the whims of war torn countries.

    It's always easy for state to be "generous" with money they are plundering from the American citizen.

    **** obiden, and **** state.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana

    So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld; and it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country without odium, sometimes even with popularity, gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.
    George Washington
     

    Libertarian01

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jan 12, 2009
    6,015
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Well I stopped reading after Reagan. We were actually well under $1 trillion when he took office and he is the first to take it into the trillions. Raising and spending far more than any president in history. No one else has ever came close. So you’re right just off on the amount. Of course Raegan proved he was anti gun and pro choice but anything was better than Carter. So everyone believed his lies, few really knew and to this day many remain ignorant of the man.

    How, exactly, do you define "well under?"

    In 1980, the national debt was $908 billion, within 10% of $1 trillion. The year Reagan took office (1981) the debt was $997 billion seven (7) monthes after he took office. To me that's well enough for rounding to say "...about $1T."

    Now, in review, when he left office in 1989 the debt was about $2.8T, so he tripled it and didn't double it. Mea Culpa on the 250%+ increase.


    Regards,

    Doug
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,984
    113
    .
    Why does he want to take money from our pockets to put money in their pockets? I can see wanting to help a nation keep its sovereignty and fight aggressors trying to take it. But this is going far beyond that mission.

    Again I ask the people who favor this, do you have a limit? Is there no number too high, or no end to your willingness to sacrifice other people’s resources.

    What’s next? We gonna help Ukrainian parents fund their kids’ college? Maybe we should buy them all electric cars. Ukrainians must like to vacation. Won't you support sending them money to take a cruise? No? You ****ing bigots. How heartless of you not to spend your own children’s future on the whims of war torn countries.

    I remember when the strategy was to "bleed out" the USSR, maybe that's what's being turned on America. We'll certainly last longer, but how much longer, and at what cost.
     

    DragonGunner

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 14, 2010
    5,575
    113
    N. Central IN
    How, exactly, do you define "well under?"

    In 1980, the national debt was $908 billion, within 10% of $1 trillion. The year Reagan took office (1981) the debt was $997 billion seven (7) monthes after he took office. To me that's well enough for rounding to say "...about $1T."

    Now, in review, when he left office in 1989 the debt was about $2.8T, so he tripled it and didn't double it. Mea Culpa on the 250%+ increase.


    Regards,

    Doug
    My sources say it was around 700 Billion. That’s way under, Raegan went hog wild on it that has never been matched since in %. So ya way under. Pick a source.
     

    Route 45

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Dec 5, 2015
    15,264
    113
    Indy
    I remember when the strategy was to "bleed out" the USSR, maybe that's what's being turned on America. We'll certainly last longer, but how much longer, and at what cost.
    In what world does 5% of our defense budget "bleed" us out? I'm not seeing Russia, which amounts to a giant third world gas station with nukes, bleeding out the United States and our allies.

    If you are fine with Putin rebuilding the Soviet Union, just say so.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,984
    113
    .
    In what world does 5% of our defense budget "bleed" us out? I'm not seeing Russia, which amounts to a giant third world gas station with nukes, bleeding out the United States and our allies.

    If you are fine with Putin rebuilding the Soviet Union, just say so.

    As I said, we will certainly last longer, but I don't have numbers on what the percentages were of the USSR spending back in the 70s-80s so I can only speculate how long.

    As far as our allies I don't have their numbers either, but I suspect they are paying less than America is.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,746
    113
    Gtown-ish
    My sources say it was around 700 Billion. That’s way under, Raegan went hog wild on it that has never been matched since in %. So ya way under. Pick a source.

    I did pick my source, the United States Treasury. It is linked.

    What is your source? I didn't notice a link...?

    Regards,

    Doug

    Who gives a ****? $700B or $1T, it's a lot of ****ing money to be in debt. And what we ended up with is a lot more ****ing money to be in debt! It's not a good attribute for Reagan.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana
    Why does he want to take money from our pockets to put money in their pockets? I can see wanting to help a nation keep its sovereignty and fight aggressors trying to take it. But this is going far beyond that mission.

    Again I ask the people who favor this, do you have a limit? Is there no number too high, or no end to your willingness to sacrifice other people’s resources.

    What’s next? We gonna help Ukrainian parents fund their kids’ college? Maybe we should buy them all electric cars. Ukrainians must like to vacation. Won't you support sending them money to take a cruise? No? You ****ing bigots. How heartless of you not to spend your own children’s future on the whims of war torn countries.
    bout the college thing...

    There is no one in Ukrainian government that the US is not paying the salary of.

    We pay most their medical care as well.

    and of course more Ukrainian debts,paid by the US taxpayer.
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,446
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom