The Funny Picture/Video Thread, 14th Edition: Ketchup Farts, Dog Sneezes and Misspelled Tattoos

[Kirk Freeman]

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Short people got no reason, no reason to work.

 

[Jsomerset]

View attachment 245635

That is why everyone’s tapes were tuned to the one that ruled the all on our crew. Never saw a new tape that jived with the old ones.

 

[HoughMade]

View attachment 245635

While there are sometimes variations, the top tape doesn't have different spacing, it's flat out missing 1/4". I've never seen that.

 

[klausm]

I dropped mine once and it bent the tang and made it go off almost a 1/4

 

[nonobaddog]

Well, candy bars keep getting smaller, why not inches?

 

[nonobaddog]

While there are sometimes variations, the top tape doesn't have different spacing, it's flat out missing 1/4". I've never seen that.

But those tapes do have different spacing - try comparing them every 1/4 inch.

 

[Bigtanker]

 

[Bigtanker]

 

[Bigtanker]

 

[Lpherr]

 

[Ingomike]

But those tapes do have different spacing - try comparing them every 1/4 inch.

I don’t see different spacing, the top tape was cut about a quarter of an inch short on the first inch. The rest appears to be optical illusion in the curvature of the blades…

 

[HoughMade]

But those tapes do have different spacing - try comparing them every 1/4 inch.

I'm not so sure. I cut and pasted the images. This makes it clear that the first 1/4" is missing from the top.

The spacing appears to look different, but it is clear that the 2 pictures of the tapes are taken from different angles. The top edge of the bottom tape is "higher" (closer to the camera) the top tape and we don't know how it would look if the top edge of the lower tape was rotated down, further away from the camera. Likewise, the top edge of the top tape is "higher", that is closer to the camera, while the lower edge is "lower", further away from the camera. Therefore, in the original pic and the pic below, we are comparing an edge further from the camera with one closer to it.



This problem with angles of the photo and closer to camera versus further away becomes more clear when I compare the top photo to itself. Because the photo is not taken perfectly face-on, it does not even line up with itself:

 

[Lpherr]

 

[AndreusMaximus]

Is this what the good folks around here call"Dennying" a thread? Or is this something else on a whole new level?

Either way I appreciate the level of commitment.

 

[semperfi211]

 

[HoughMade]

Is this what the good folks around here call"Dennying" a thread? Or is this something else on a whole new level?

Either way I appreciate the level of commitment.

Perhaps.......I am not returning to my normal work routine well.

 

[nonobaddog]

I'm not so sure. I cut and pasted the images. This makes it clear that the first 1/4" is missing from the top.

The spacing appears to look different, but it is clear that the 2 pictures of the tapes are taken from different angles. The top edge of the bottom tape is "higher" (closer to the camera) the top tape and we don't know how it would look if the top edge of the lower tape was rotated down, further away from the camera. Likewise, the top edge of the top tape is "higher", that is closer to the camera, while the lower edge is "lower", further away from the camera. Therefore, in the original pic and the pic below, we are comparing an edge further from the camera with one closer to it.

View attachment 245778

This problem with angles of the photo and closer to camera versus further away becomes more clear when I compare the top photo to itself. Because the photo is not taken perfectly face-on, it does not even line up with itself:

View attachment 245783

Well done!
I think the angle from the camera explains the whole thing.

 

[HoughMade]

 

[Wolfhound]