If we understand the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are innate rather than granted by the government, then I don't think the limitation to citizens alone is reasonable. I don't think any government has the authority to deny human rights without a conviction by a jury.
No. I mean that human rights can't be limited to U.S. citizens alone but should apply to all humans.
There's more than one innate human right, and I've yet to find someone running for a job in D.C. that doesn't intend to infringe on some number of them.
Only one of those rights gives you the ability to defend all your other rights. And you chose to back the guy vowing to take that right away. Zero Credibility.
You may convert people to actually liking guns and shooting but you're not likely to change their voting habits.
Don't put it past the leftists to do just that, just like the cake baker debacle where they drove well out of their way to that particular baker just to cause controversy.
I disagree
Yes, when even some of our own most prolific members here vote for gun grabbers I don't expect a lib that ran out and bought a single 9mm to change their voting habits.
My thoughts too.
