The new Squad 2021?

[KLB]

Looks like she filed them against two people. The multiples are for denials.

Ah, so those are not TROs against her, but rather her filing them against others.

 

[bwframe]

Lemme help you here, Kut. This is bound to smear...



..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

 

[bwframe]

Interesting tweet from a bit ago...



The whole conversation is worth a look. Our girl goes back and forth with some Kut-like mentalities...

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Interesting tweet from a bit ago...

View attachment 122621

The whole conversation is worth a look. Our girl goes back and forth with some Kut-like mentalities...

A Glock? If they were real patriots, they'd have given her a 1911!

 

[foszoe]

We'll know what she is soon enough. If she's a real patriot, she'll be out of office after a single term.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

We'll know what she is soon enough. If she's a real patriot, she'll be out of office after a single term.

I know term limits are a popular subject, but who has advocated for a single term? 2 terms is the bottom limit I've seen.

 

[foszoe]

I know term limits are a popular subject, but who has advocated for a single term? 2 terms is the bottom limit I've seen.

I am referring to the massive Chinese financed cheating scheme that will eliminate any true patriot if they win a fluke first term.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

LOL the first page of this thread is hilarious. The same guys who claim George Floyd’s past shouldn’t be taken into consideration now say they’re surprised a congresswoman has been been elected because of her past run ins with LEO.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

I am referring to the massive Chinese financed cheating scheme that will eliminate any true patriot if they win a fluke first term.

I have no idea what this even means.

 

[bwframe]

Man oh man, just ran a little Google search on Lauren Boebert.

Looks like the left are more scared of her than they are of Trump?

Scared less.

Here's the article Kut got his talking points from...

GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert and husband racked up arrests in home district

Rep. Lauren Boebert, the gun-toting freshman Republican Colorado congresswoman who ran on a law-and-order platform, has had several dust-ups with police, starting as a teenager. The 34-year-old law…

nypost.com

 

[KLB]

That chick and her husband a rap sheep longer than my..... uh.... arm. She very well may be the right’s version of AOC - looney.

GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert and husband racked up arrests in home district

Rep. Lauren Boebert, the gun-toting freshman Republican Colorado congresswoman who ran on a law-and-order platform, has had several dust-ups with police, starting as a teenager. The 34-year-old law…

www.google.com

Did you not find information on her husband? I’ll be honest, after reading up on those two, I was really surprised she was elected. Her and her husband seem to have, at least to me, way too many brushes with the law.

Well, for me personally, I have a hard time taking someone seriously who preaches “rule of law,” but has a history of not adhering to it. It’s mainly about responsibility, and I hardly think any who brushes of court and has warrants issued for them, counts as responsible.

This topic was meant to discus the newest members of Congress. My criticisms are within the topic. And while I’d like engage in, yet another, tiresome purity test that have popped recently, I have come to the realization that regardless of my answer people won’t be satisfied. So I feel it would not be beneficial to humor your questions, which would obviously derail this thread, and make me the topic.
How about we just keep this discussion on topic,’eh?

So here are all of Kut's posts on page 1.

LOL the first page of this thread is hilarious. The same guys who claim George Floyd’s past shouldn’t be taken into consideration now say a congresswoman shouldn’t have been elected because of her past run ins with LEO.

Where did he say she should not have been elected? Surprised she was and would not have voted for are not the same as should not have been elected.

I would imagine that a lot of people may have been surprised she was elected with all of that. It used to be that kind of stuff could easily derail an election.

Seriously, with as much as he says that is worthy of challenging him, why do people feel the need to misrepresent what he says to be mad at him?

 

[Hatin Since 87]

So here are all of Kut's posts on page 1.

Where did he say she should not have been elected? Surprised she was and would not have voted for are not the same as should not have been elected.

I would imagine that a lot of people may have been surprised she was elected with all of that. It used to be that kind of stuff could easily derail an election.

Seriously, with as much as he says that is worthy of challenging him, why do people feel the need to misrepresent what he says to be mad at him?

Ah. Sorry. I’ll edit my post.


LOL the first page of this thread is hilarious. The same guys who claim George Floyd’s past shouldn’t be taken into consideration now say they’re surprised a congresswoman has been been elected because of her past run ins with LEO.



The main point of the post remains the same. And kut wasn’t the only one. I actually don’t even see his posts unless someone quotes him and I click to read what was said...

 

[BugI02]

Seriously, with as much as he says that is worthy of challenging him, why do people feel the need to misrepresent what he says to be mad at him?

Because we would like to see him put down the spoon and engage on a more realistic level. Jetta , too

He seems to have difficulty getting over the fact that Obama was the first ghey president

 

[Kutnupe14]

If

Ah. Sorry. I’ll edit my post.


LOL the first page of this thread is hilarious. The same guys who claim George Floyd’s past shouldn’t be taken into consideration now say they’re surprised a congresswoman has been been elected because of her past run ins with LEO.



The main point of the post remains the same. And kut wasn’t the only one. I actually don’t even see his posts unless someone quotes him and I click to read what was said...

Someone is either lying, or has a bad memory, but I didn’t make any comment on Floyd’s past. I honestly don’t even know what it is.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Because we would like to see him put down the spoon and engage on a more realistic level. Jetta , too

He seems to have difficulty getting over the fact that Obama was the first ghey president

My elevator only goes up bro. Either raise your game, or don’t play. But that comment isn’t with you in mind. You’re worthy...

...enough.
You’re welcome. Lol

 

[BugI02]

The second line was to demonstrate that I have a spoon, too

I'd prefer to keep it in the drawer

 

[ditcherman]

Then whomever is doing that is failing miserably, and probably isn't the sharpest knife in the box. But there a lot of butter knife folks out there.

Jeephammer, is that you?

(I can smell the condescension from here)

 

[ditcherman]

LOL the first page of this thread is hilarious. The same guys who claim George Floyd’s past shouldn’t be taken into consideration now say they’re surprised a congresswoman has been been elected because of her past run ins with LEO.

Underated comment, I laughed the whole way through! In a sad sort of way.
I also got what you meant with the original.
But I can't believe you're a blocker, where is the fun in that?

 

[larcat]

"I'll take have they been arrested for it yet?" for $200 Alex.
and follow that up with
"No? Call me when they are," for an additional $300...
...and the close out the "Things Conservatives Want to Believe Because Alex Jones Said So,"
I'll take the "Temporary Blindness or Hypocrisy, when Conservatives Do it?" for $500

There is literally a...

@churchmouse please excuse this but it's just descriptive.

Video of Hunter Biden getting a footjob from a prostitute while smoking either crack or meth floating around on the internet, in addition to other similar media.

I'm not a Trumper, but given the literal video evidence, your post is assinine.

I'm glad you're here, and my politics are probably closer to yours than most people on this site's are, but come on man.

*edit

If I had a son, that video would preclude me from getting a security clearance, very likely. Just for what it's worth.

 

[ditcherman]

There is literally a...

@churchmouse please excuse this but it's just descriptive.

Video of Hunter Biden getting a footjob from a prostitute while smoking either crack or meth floating around on the internet, in addition to other similar media.

I'm not a Trumper, but given the literal video evidence, your post is assinine.

I'm glad you're here, and my politics are probably closer to yours than most people on this site's are, but come on man.

*edit

If I had a son, that video would preclude me from getting a security clearance, very likely. Just for what it's worth.

Same.
Some of my early early posts on here were agreeing with Kut and Jamil. I had lurked long enough to know what I was doing was against the majority.
This just seems disingenuous.