President Biden

[foszoe]

Markets open. Took Biden one day to close every index at record highs. My 401k is looking better than ever! Time to buy more green energy stocks!

 

[buckwacker]

Markets open. Took Biden one day to close every index at record highs. My 401k is looking better than ever! Time to buy more green energy stocks!

Purple?

 

[jamil]

At the very least it shows the rest of the world that we can't be dismissed as anti-environment (Paris Accords), frivolous spending (wall), bigots (Muslim Ban)

Why virtue signal when participation doesn't actually accomplish the goal of reducing Earth's temperature? I mean, it's not like those other nations don't spend money frivolously too. The "Muslim ban" is not bigotry though. That's a figment of delusional people's minds.

Regardless how it's been portrayed, banning travel from countries which tend to harbor terrorists (notwithstanding the curious exclusion of some countries who should be on that list) is helpful to our country, not hurtful. If those countries have improved their behavior, okay then. That's the thing that should precipitate removing their country from the list, and not some nonsense narrative that it's "bigotry".

 

[jamil]

Markets open. Took Biden one day to close every index at record highs. My 401k is looking better than ever! Time to buy more green energy stocks!

I'll probably increase my position in Green ETF's and buy into XLS as a hedge on the keystone pipeline ETF. Exon et al will probably edge up as fossil fuel prices increase.

 

[jamil]

Purple?

No. There's still money to be made on the market even though a ********** is sitting in the whitehouse.

Amazon's probably gonna reach even higher when Biden puts us through his "dark winter".

 

[Kutnupe14]

I've come to expect this as your standard reply when you know you can't offer a serious logical rebuttal. I've asked you a few questions over the last few weeks, for which your response is either answering a question I didn't ask, making some tenuously related, tangential statement to change the subject, or simply pretending I never asked it.

O'rly. Well here's your chance to get those answers, because honestly, I don't even remember them. I actually think you're mis-remembering, but If they were dumb questions, yes, I probably ignored them. If they were honest questions, I'm sorry I missed them. So sir, what are your questions. Even though, I'd admit, I'm wondering if you'll actually have a question, and not dismiss the request with some version of "its too late now."

 

[Kutnupe14]

I don't agree with all that stuff. I don't think it's helpful at all. But perhaps, eventually, the people who are doing it will begin to understand the mindset of the folks who did it before them, but with Trump. They do it for exactly the same reasons. It's a function of nature, not a specific ideology.

"I don't think it's helpful at all," followed up by an explanation as to how it could be helpful? Lol

 

[Rookie]

I've come to expect this as your standard reply when you know you can't offer a serious logical rebuttal. I've asked you a few questions over the last few weeks, for which your response is either answering a question I didn't ask, making some tenuously related, tangential statement to change the subject, or simply pretending I never asked it.

 

[d.kaufman]

Anyways, the President has signed several EOs reversing EOs from the previous administration.
Some of those include:
-Eliminating the "Muslim Ban"
-Re-entering the Paris Climate Accords
-Revoking the permit for the Keystone Pipeline
-Putting a halt to the construction of the wall
-Renewing commitment to DACA

It is exactly stuff like this, that many people voted for Biden.

Also exactly stuff like this that people voted against

 

[buckwacker]

O'rly. Well here's your chance to get those answers, because honestly, I don't even remember them. I actually think you're mis-remembering, but If they were dumb questions, yes, I probably ignored them. If they were honest questions, I'm sorry I missed them. So sir, what are your questions. Even though, I'd admit, I'm wondering if you'll actually have a question, and not dismiss the request with some version of "its too late now."

Yeah, that's what you said last time I called you out for avoiding a question. You don't ask the teacher to find the homework that you lost. The new software is handy for these types of detective jobs, you can find any post where I quoted one of yours. Why don't you search through those and get back to me when you find the unanswered questions, preffereably with answers and not more excuses and obfuscation.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Its amazing to me how we disliked how Trump was treated yet so many here have become what they hated. We can disagree and debate positions amongst each other without name calling like school children. That behavior just reinforces the stereotype liberals have of us. We have the opportunity to take the high road and lead by example but no one seems to want to.

1. Biden made the choice to be a sworn enemy of the 2A, the Constitution at large, and the Republic in general as well as all of us who take any of the above seriously.

2. Trump did NOT enter office effectively declaring war on large portions of the American population.

3. I don't give 3/16 of a damn what liberals think. If they had a shred of sense they wouldn't be liberals.

4. "Taking the high road" has never yielded any practical results other than getting broomstick shoved up our asses (figuratively thank God). I, for one, am not volunteering for more repetitions.

 

[BigRed]

Yep.... basically like trying to reason with a petulant child.

 

[drillsgt]

At the very least it shows the rest of the world that we can't be dismissed as anti-environment (Paris Accords), frivolous spending (wall), bigots (Muslim Ban)

So we want to commit billions of dollars to some nebulous green fund so the world can see how woke we are? It's this kind of nonsense from obama that Trump was right for stamping out, talk about frivolous spending. You can argue the economics of the wall but in reality if you want to make it harder for someone to go from point A to point B then a natural or man made barrier can help. The fact that you call it the 'muslim ban' lol shows how biased you are, there was no muslim ban, it was restrictions on travel from those living in countries known for state sponsored terrorism. But at least we won't be called xenophobic now.

 

[jbombelli]

Yeah, that's what you said last time I called you out for avoiding a question. You don't ask the teacher to find the homework that you lost. The new software is handy for these types of detective jobs, you can find any post where I quoted one of yours. Why don't you search through those and get back to me when you find the unanswered questions, preffereably with answers and not more excuses and obfuscation.

Good luck with that. Several of us have been down this same road many times, and reached the same destination you have.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Yeah, that's what you said last time I called you out for avoiding a question. You don't ask the teacher to find the homework that you lost. The new software is handy for these types of detective jobs, you can find any post where I quoted one of yours. Why don't you search through those and get back to me when you find the unanswered questions, preffereably with answers and not more excuses and obfuscation.

Like I said, a version of "its too late now." But I will do YOU a solid, so you don't even have to think about it anymore. I will simply not answer any of your questions in the future, that way it's not a problem.

 

[jamil]

24 mass shootings happened during the 8 years of "HOPE." That's far and away more than any other president.

It's not a contest. There isn't anything magical about Trump's policies that reduced mass shootings. People aren't addressing the real causes. It's not video games. It's not the availability of guns.

 

[printcraft]

old man bad! right?

The guy has been a worthless leach for 47 years in Washington... can you name any accomplishments outside of “evil gun” bans?

 

[buckwacker]

Like I said, a version of "its too late now." But I will do YOU a solid, so you don't even have to think about it anymore. I will simply not answer any of your questions in the future, that way it's not a problem.

Well, that's sort of what you have been doing anyway, not because I asked "dumb" questions, but because I asked some that were uncomfortable for you. How is it doing me a "solid" for you to refuse to engage in a debate that you seem to be losing? Avoiding tough questions benefits you, at least in your mind, because you think it avoids highlighting the weakness of your posituon. To those watching it only serves to reveal that you aren't comfortable or are unable to articulate areasoned, logical rebuttal.

 

[buckwacker]

No. There's still money to be made on the market even though a ********** is sitting in the whitehouse.

Amazon's probably gonna reach even higher when Biden puts us through his "dark winter".

Not denying that, I was referring to the implied tenor of foz's post.

 

[jamil]

old man bad! right?

I don't think he's saying Biden is bad because he's old. He's not alleging that Biden has an ear piece because he's old. He has it so that people on the other end can tell him how to act.