Hopefully a soon to be unemployed FBI agent. Hopefully, he wasn't working on either the Clinton or Trump investigations. If so, one or two things have been explained.
Oh, I like City BBQ. I wish they had one up here.
Usually i just stick my gun in its holster and hold it upside down over my bed to check retention on a new one.
Im not sure any of my holsters are backflip rated, perhaps I should up my retention standards.
... but seriously can we stop doing stuff like this? I work in liberal land and everyday i get to hear about this kind of thing from them.
Makes the 2A harder to defend when i get " If an FBI agent cant be trusted then...."
Since they are most often required to carry and covered by LEAP pay it's you and me that will be paying since he was within his "scope of employment". So the Agency will write a check. Depending on the relationship between the state and FBI Office he will probably not face serious criminal charges ((just the messenger bot agreeing)
His Agency will bot be as forgiving. Special Agents face minimum 30 day suspension for DUI so I can only imagine how this will fo. Why he chose to bust a move when carrying who knows.
Not sure what FBI rules are but when I worked for the US Marshals Service we were required to use a thumb break holster. Little different escorting prisoners to and from than investigating. And we must have been terrible dancers because none of us ever thought about doing it LOL
City BBQ is a fine choice. More of a LGG fan myself.
Anywho, the 302 will make some reference to the gun being unloaded.
What is THE reason people ALWAYS give for reckless behavior firearms? Right, "eet ain't low-dead".
Refuse this flank and you eliminate a rationale for this reckless behaviour.
Yeah, but it seems like there’s only so many times you can go to that well.There's people who've made a living of being wantonly stupid on video. Isn't that the basic premise of Jackass and other shows of that genre?
It’s not always a nail.City BBQ is a fine choice. More of a LGG fan myself.
Anywho, the 302 will make some reference to the gun being unloaded.
What is THE reason people ALWAYS give for reckless behavior firearms? Right, "eet ain't low-dead".
Refuse this flank and you eliminate a rationale for this reckless behaviour.
All way too far for me to go. I can't be scared of that area. I have no idea where it itIt's fair. I eat it often enough... but if you want some really good stuff- King's Ribs, on Keystone, near the fairgrounds. If you're scared of the area, you can take solace knowing that they have armed security, lol.
What is THE reason people ALWAYS give for reckless behavior firearms? Right, "eet ain't low-dead".
.
Anywho, the 302 will make some reference to the gun being unloaded.
Now come on. We both know that's not how it works. (Not picking on you). The system is flawed. The American people will be forking over big bundles of cash for this **** for brains mistake. FBI will most likely move to terminate but he will resign first and probably end up in the private sector somewhere.It's rare to catch such wanton stupidity on video. Hopefully the poor guy who got shot will recover and collect a nice sum directly from the individual whose negligence caused his injury and not the taxpayers.
16th and Tibbs...Tips dinner. LOVE that place.It's fair. I eat it often enough... but if you want some really good stuff- King's Ribs, on Keystone, near the fairgrounds. If you're scared of the area, you can take solace knowing that they have armed security, lol.
I'm positive this won't change your dedication to your shtick, but the facts are against you no matter how many times you toss it out as a universal answer.
No shtick, it is human nature.
I'll wait and see but I want to see that 302.
No shtick, it is human nature.
I'll wait and see but I want to see that 302.
Thanks for this. I will make sure to do that when I have people over to shoot from now on as well. I hadn't really thought about it.No, it's a shtick. Any mention of an unintended discharge, regardless of situation or context, and you dive in with your speech impediment routine and trot out the "always blaming unloaded guns" which, again, reality does not show. It's worn thin, even among your friends.
The speech impediment shtick isn't helpful, it's just more noise in a crowded space. If you think it's helpful, I'd suggest reading Rhino's post again. Even people who you apparently count as a friend are telling you to rethink your approach. Does that tell you nothing? I've changed my safety brief based on incidents of unintended discharges. I incorporate a hot brass procedure, for example, which I didn't when I first started. When you hear an account of how somebody got hot brass down their shirt, danced around, and had an unintended discharge that killed someone the "Freeman shtick" helps nobody. It's not actionable. It creates no new mind set. It creates no thought process to pre-plan actions should the situation occur. It's just noise. Mentioning that it's possible to get hot brass down your shirt, it will hurt, but holster or ground your gun THEN dance it out is actionable. It creates a plan. The person now has a better chance of being safe with a gun when they find themselves in that situation because they don't have to think of a plan on the fly under pain, they can just execute what they've already thought about.
That's the difference between a shtick and actually advancing gun safety.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to BehindBlueI's again.