MilitaryArms
Master
- Apr 19, 2008
- 2,751
- 48
Link: https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2018/bills/senate/111
I don't know what a "multi-burst trigger activator" is, but I assume they're talking about our very own (Seymour IN) FosTech and their ECHO trigger. Well, we have our state trying to put one of our own out of business it seems.
The ECHO trigger doesn't cause a "multi-burst", it's a fire on pull and fire on release trigger, something the ATF has long held isn't a machine gun. Indiana is unique in its pursuit of "multi-burst triggers" because everyone else is focused on a more nebulous ban of all "rate increasing devices".
The wording of IN's law isn't on the site linked to above. I really want to see what they are defining as a "multi-burst trigger".
Either way, PLEASE BLOW Senator Greg Taylor's phones and inbox. You can contact him here: https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2018/legislators/legislator_greg_taylor_976/
Tim
I don't know what a "multi-burst trigger activator" is, but I assume they're talking about our very own (Seymour IN) FosTech and their ECHO trigger. Well, we have our state trying to put one of our own out of business it seems.
The ECHO trigger doesn't cause a "multi-burst", it's a fire on pull and fire on release trigger, something the ATF has long held isn't a machine gun. Indiana is unique in its pursuit of "multi-burst triggers" because everyone else is focused on a more nebulous ban of all "rate increasing devices".
The wording of IN's law isn't on the site linked to above. I really want to see what they are defining as a "multi-burst trigger".
Either way, PLEASE BLOW Senator Greg Taylor's phones and inbox. You can contact him here: https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2018/legislators/legislator_greg_taylor_976/
Tim