Why changed what worked? He might change who some of the targets of his derision are but why would he change tactics?
Because what made Cruz look thin-skinned and Rubio look childish will make Hillary look sympathetic.
Why changed what worked? He might change who some of the targets of his derision are but why would he change tactics?
Because what made Cruz look thin-skinned and Rubio look childish will make Hillary look sympathetic.
Yes, but that is my point. Unless something drastic happens between now and November, HRC doesn't have a statistical chance to win Indiana. You can vote for Gary Johnson (this is not an endorsement from me, just using your example), boost the Libertarian numbers, and Trump will still win.
That "Who Said It" quiz is tough. 7/15 for me.
I'm not sure that washing ones hands of a difficult situation has ever worked out as far as showing that one is not responsible for the results
I'm not sure Hillary will garner the sympathy many think she will. I don't have a ton of democrat friends on my FB feed but the few I have, are all Bernie, all the time. With stuff like that and the general vibe I get by watching my regular news sources, Hillary just isn't that well liked, even by her own side.
I'm not sure I understand.
If I don't vote for Trump, but he still wins Indiana, the level of individual "responsibility" is irrelevant. Majority (or plurality, clearly) wins. If it is clear that enough people will vote Trump for him to win Indiana, my vote - and what I do with it - doesn't really matter. Again, I will say that if the polling is close, I'll reconsider. I just think that will be VERY improbable.
Your vote should count to youI'm not sure I understand.
If I don't vote for Trump, but he still wins Indiana, the level of individual "responsibility" is irrelevant. Majority (or plurality, clearly) wins. If it is clear that enough people will vote Trump for him to win Indiana, my vote - and what I do with it - doesn't really matter. Again, I will say that if the polling is close, I'll reconsider. I just think that will be VERY improbable.
Your vote should count to you
For the #NeverRelevant non-voters keeping score, RCP's polling average for Clinton vs Trump has maintained its steady decline in the Clinton advantage. In the last several weeks it has declined past +7.2 to +6.8 and +6.5 to its current +5.7 - down from a post-Wisconsin high of +9.8 for Clinton. Could be a trend or something
ETA: RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton