One of these days I'm going to send him his duel waiver, all filled out and signed, with a note that says "our duel starts now."
Got to agree there!Hes not wrong but he's not right either
Asshat, or not, he has put forward a proper statement.
As in the foundling of states under the Articles of Confederation,
Ask yourself one question. How can they give permission (reciprocity enactment), when they don't have the founding authority to do such?
For some reason I was reminded of the good old days when the INGO would destroy a member for making a negative comment about yeager. I wonder if any private government documents can be exposed.Everything Yeager said was incorrect.
all of this further illustrates the need for an Article 5 Convention of States to deal with these kinds of matters. it is the states that created the Constitution and it is them and them alone that can fix what has become broken.
Why? So they can redefine, in writing this time, what "shall not be infringed" means, or take that wording out entirely? We don't need a Constitutional Convention. With how things go these days, with all the backroom deals, and the way nobody cares about the Constitution anymore, I flat guarantee WE'LL LOSE SOMETHING that we don't want to lose.
I flat guarantee we won't. A Convention of States would have to be specific to Amendments being proposed to the Constitution and it would only take 17 states refusing to participate in proposing such amendments to defeat it and only 13 states refusing to ratify. Legislatures would control their delegate(s) and could recall them at any time.
The framers of the Constitution intended for this process to be used to rectify issues and its use is long overdue.