Blog: Public school assignment: 'must argue that Jews are evil'
First it was the anti-2nd amendment assignment. Then it was the abdication of rights for safety. Now this? Who can honestly tell me this isn't about indoctrination?
Despite all that, I'm willing to let it slide as one extremely stupid teacher. But how do you explain this?
"Worded differently?" What, so it would be less obvious that the teacher is a Jew-hater?
Is she just another unfortunate victim of government schools that is suffering from an inordinate ignorance of the English language. Or is she playing the two-step with the spin doctor and trying to make an apology without apologizing? Why wouldn't she want to apologize? How is this NOT grotesque and wrong? And the next time a teacher wants to assign a persuasive essay writing assignment and has for the context a slave owner who must convince the local elected officials why slavery must remain legal because blacks aren't human and therefore there is nothing morally wrong with forced labor, there will be no qualms, right? Right?
But it's just an isolated incident, I suppose.
First it was the anti-2nd amendment assignment. Then it was the abdication of rights for safety. Now this? Who can honestly tell me this isn't about indoctrination?
Despite all that, I'm willing to let it slide as one extremely stupid teacher. But how do you explain this?
The comments of the Albany school superintendent reported by the Times-Union are not very reassuring either:
Albany Superintendent Marguerite Vanden Wyngaard said. She said the assignment should have been worded differently.
"I would apologize to our families," she said
She "would apologize"? That is a conditional statement, which means she isn't apologizing yet, but she would if something else happened. Or maybe she just doesn't understand the language she is using. Once again, the question is: evil or just stupid?
"Worded differently?" What, so it would be less obvious that the teacher is a Jew-hater?
Is she just another unfortunate victim of government schools that is suffering from an inordinate ignorance of the English language. Or is she playing the two-step with the spin doctor and trying to make an apology without apologizing? Why wouldn't she want to apologize? How is this NOT grotesque and wrong? And the next time a teacher wants to assign a persuasive essay writing assignment and has for the context a slave owner who must convince the local elected officials why slavery must remain legal because blacks aren't human and therefore there is nothing morally wrong with forced labor, there will be no qualms, right? Right?
But it's just an isolated incident, I suppose.