I choose to live with a sub-par internet experience, and risk malicious adware.
Fine fine.
I choose to live with a sub-par internet experience, and risk malicious adware.
Fine fine.
The name Amazon is culturel appropriation and therefore, problematic.
I thought the "Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe"... Sorry.. just couldn't resist that!
Ron
[snip]
And some information about how the J-58 engine that powered the SR-71 to Mach 3+
[video=youtube;F3ao5SCedIk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3ao5SCedIk[/video]
We run is similar circles. Check out DeBoss Garage. He is fun to follow ane 805Roadking. there are a few more I can't think of at the moment.
We are playing in Youtube's house, their rules. It sucks. Some of the names that they have demonetized were great content with a lot of veiws
If genius is even somewhat heritable, we should have been encouraging Kelly Johnson to have many children
Well. I guess the old lady who posts a video of her 40lb cat taking a **** on the counter and gets a million views but only has 993 subsribers ain’t getting ****.The next ****storm in the making is on the way.
They're changing the eligibility requirements for monetization. This mostly ****s over the smaller content creators
Additional Changes to the YouTube Partner Program (YPP) to Better Protect Creators
I can't believe idiots actualy get followers and make money. I bet some of the bad firearm advice YouTube'ers are ingo members. In this age of technology a lot of people live their life watching other people live their lives. What a sad existence
I can't believe idiots actualy get followers and make money. I bet some of the bad firearm advice YouTube'ers are ingo members. In this age of technology a lot of people live their life watching other people live their lives. What a sad existence
With the larger channels, this is a full-time job. They create content much like television shows. They have producers, editors, entire companies with a staff full of workers behind what they do.
The quality of some of the content on YouTube is even beyond what you would find on TV. A channel called "The Great War", for example... it covers the entirety of World War 1, week after week, in "real time". A ton of research and work is put into narrating it, producing it, and editing it into a suitable-length YouTube video that gets millions of views. It also serves the purpose of educating today's generations on all the nuances and details of World War 1 far beyond what they'd learn about it in school. I definitely learned more about it than I ever did before YouTube. But I'm also a big WW1/WW2 nerd.
Now, if you're talking about the "streamer" sorts of people on YouTube... the "Logan Paul" types that just walk around and try to be as outrageous as they can for the views... yeah, I can't get behind those. I don't get the appeal... I understand it... but I personally don't buy into it. It's embarrassing for them and everyone involved, and caters to the lowest common denominator.
But just offering a different viewpoint on "this age of technology" and the sort of content being produced.
For every nonsense channel out there, or camwhore... there's an amazingly educational firearm, history, or tech channel out there that does good things.