Supremes say no warrant, no search

[actaeon277]

For this case or in general?

In general.

 

[dieselrealtor]

How often do they all agree to form a unanimous decision?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

 

[Spear Dane]

How often do they all agree to form a unanimous decision?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down two 9-0 opinions Monday, proving that the often-contentious bench can come together in cases involving tax law and criminal procedure.


In the first, CIC Services v. Internal Revenue Service, the Court ruled on the scope of the Anti-Injunction Act, a statute which limits lawsuits seeking to block the assessment or collection of a tax. The Court ruled that despite a federal law prohibiting lawsuits aimed at striking down taxes, not every IRS rule is considered a “tax” entitled to that kind of immunity.

 

[bwframe]

Who in power do we ask about how this affects specifically Indiana's red flag law?

I always did think that a warrant should be required for red flag search warrants, EVEN in the event of the searched party "giving permission."

 

[KLB]

In general.

It is not uncommon. More than a third of cases every year are unanimous.

 

[jamil]

Who in power do we ask about how this affects specifically Indiana's red flag law?

I always did think that a warrant should be required for red flag search warrants, EVEN in the event of the searched party "giving permission."

See Hough’s post. I think he addressed that point well enough.

 

[HoughMade]

It is not uncommon. More than a third of cases every year are unanimous.

Correct.

Another 15% (or so) has only 1 dissenting vote.

Most cases that reach the SC are pure applications of law and don't have controversial political overtones.

 

[foszoe]

Correct.

Another 15% (or so) has only 1 dissenting vote.

Most cases that reach the SC are pure applications of law and don't have controversial political overtones.

Lets revisit political overtones again in say a decade

 

[bwframe]

Who in power do we ask about how this affects specifically Indiana's red flag law?

I always did think that a warrant should be required for red flag search warrants, EVEN in the event of the searched party "giving permission."

Interesting related thread...

IMPD Property Room Woes.

Just another example of the Indianapolis anti-gun, intentional slow walk of returning people's guns to them. And why I say to not carry a gun that you have so much money in that if God forbid you have to lawfully use it in self defense, that you STILL won't end up being a robbery victim anyway...

www.indianagunowners.com