Sorry the springfield scope curious on those prices?
I've used Zeiss glass with good results.
Of course you've already looked at Nightforce, Schmidt Bender, and U.S. Optics right?
Those scope are way too much money, I have two NIGHTFORCE & LEUPOLD MARK 4, but for the money I'm buying BURRIS BLACK DIAMOND & BUSHNELL ELITE
it all depends on the use. for most shooters you are correct they will never use a high end optic to there potential or use the extra features they have. most shooters will never notice the diffrence between a couple hundred dollar scope and a couple thousand dollar scope.
I only bought the two NIGHTFORCE NXS, because I was told that I needed the NIGHTFORCE NXS for my McMILLAN 50 BMG, but I've beening shooting 50 BMG with a BURRIS BLACK DIAMOND 8-32x50 & the only thing that scope lacks is {MOA} it only has 39 moa, but the mount on the McMILLAN gives you another 20 moa. In the future I would buy the BURRIS BLACK DIAMOND 6-24x50, cause it has 52 moa
There seems to be a number of collectors of the Springfield scopes for some reason. I have owned a couple of Springfield scopes and IMO they were nothing to write home about. Not kicking on your scope but it is what it is. IMO I would sell it and upgrade. A 400.00 Super Sniper is three times the scope than any of the Springfield's.
I have got both the Springfield and the Super Sniper. The SS scope has way to small of a clearance for magnum calibers. Very hard to look thru and keep your eye distance from the scope
but your saying the tracking, recticle measurements, clarity, and everything else is jsut as good as the nightforce?
im not saying the burris is as bad scope, im saying there are features on the nightforce that alot of shooters dont need.
as far as holding up to a 50 there are a ton of scopes cheaper than nf that will do that