I heard that hardwood is more desirable than softwoodI've always heard that if you keep the bushes and shrubs trimmed, it makes the timber look bigger. Any truth to that?
I heard that hardwood is more desirable than softwoodI've always heard that if you keep the bushes and shrubs trimmed, it makes the timber look bigger. Any truth to that?
Boy did this thread go sideways in a hurry.I heard that hardwood is more desirable than softwood
Cherry is the one species that nobody wants. The market report shows good pricing but comments say different. I will snap a pic of market report comment. 20 yrs ago cherry was king, the red woods, cherry, red oak were both king, the market trends switched to lighter woods maple white oak and they've remained top dogs ever since.What about black cherry? I have a lot of it. I have 165 acres that hasn’t been timbered in 33 years, and might hold out for 35 or 40 years
I want all you can send me...Cherry is the one species that nobody wants...
I heard that hardwood is more desirable than softwood
John Bobbitt didn't either. His wife had other ideas though.I have no interest in having mine cut and hauled away.
Okiegirl: "When you have big timber, you don't have to worry about the bushes & shrubs."I've always heard that if you keep the bushes and shrubs trimmed, it makes the timber look bigger. Any truth to that?
Which is exactly what I did. We will be moving on and contacting other agencies. We do need to thin the forest.All I can say—and you know exactly where I’m coming from—is that you need to speak with somebody(s) with no vested interest in you selling your timber.
Hello yetti462, I agree 100%.Best way is sell through a consulting forester. They will mark, inventory, sell and monitor the harvest and see to it the terms of the contract are met.
Timber buyer will say, "don't pay them a fee, I'll make you more, yada, yada.".
Every sale I've been involved with that the landowner wanted a second opinion on , that was approached by a buyer first, I sold less trees, and after paying me my 8% they still made more than their first offer and had a woods left.
"Shares...logger gets half is that about the norm?" is a question I get all the time. I ask, "You planted your crop and grew it to maturity, I pick it and get half, sound fair?"
Net shares is another trick they'll run. Ive seen contracts people have signed that are on net shares. Horrible way to do it. Logger pays his labor and haul bill basically makes 20 cents a board ft of of you then splits the profit of log sales. Bad idea.
A buyer has choice trees. aka high grading. Only selling 100 trees, but they pick the best in the woods and leave you sh!t.
Yeah, 8K would equal $80 per tree. You could make more selling as firewood!Which is exactly what I did. We will be moving on and contacting other agencies. We do need to thin the forest.
We had our suspicions confirmed tonight, $7,000 - $8,000 for 100+ logs was not a fair estimate.
Tip of the hat to Yetti462.
Not to gain say you or yetti but from what I've seen I wouldn't have a problem selling poplar down to 20" since it grows fast, often has more than 2 logs, and doesn't taper as much as other species. All other species though, I'd agree that bigger is better.My thoughts as well having sold timber and watched my parents and grandparents do so. I won't sell anything smaller than 24" at the base. Bigger would make me happier. My place is probably lying safe until after I die with that standard.