Ron Paul Soft on Big Government???

[jeremy]

He's got a tougher plan than Reagan. Yeah I went there.

Reagan was not the Savior that most espouse him to be either...

Here's my plan for this election.

I will ***** about and work to torpedo any candidate who actually espouses beliefs different from the status quo and has a record and plan to make the government and debt smaller.

Once the hand picked establishment candidate is elected, I will make excuses for his increased spending and government growth over the next 4-8 years. Once the opposing party wins, I will trade in the excuses for rants and name calling for the opposing party president.

Wash, rinse, repeat. It appears I half half of INGO with me. Anyone else on board?

Why is it wrong to question what motives that any career Polotician has done?!

One man; one vote. Wasn't the house of representatives explained to you in school?

Yes the Process was explained in pretty good detail to me.
Leadership, and Compromise can be used to further a LOT of ambitions through the process...
Look at what several other Politicians have gotten passed in the Last 30 years. For better or worse...

Instead of responding with further condescension, why not try making an actual argument in response?

Why?!
All that whatever I post is met with is Scorn and Anger because I fail to fall into line with your side.

Because there may be some people reading your posts who could be swayed by a logical, rational argument. If you have a legitimate response then let's hear it.

I will post Logical Arguments as soon as you get your Side of the Paul Camp to do the Same.

 

[HICKMAN]

He's got a tougher plan than Reagan. Yeah I went there.

Reagan was a RINO by todays standards

 

[HICKMAN]

Wash, rinse, repeat. It appears I half half of INGO with me. Anyone else on board?

 

[steveh_131]

BTW are ocsdar posts "legitimate"?

Can you cross the thin Paulbot line and be truthful and call out one of your own?

Yes, when he pointed out that Paul has a single vote and can't change everything on his own. No candidate could. Nevertheless, his voting record and legislation introduced shows a history of putting his money where his mouth is.

This is a legitimate argument. What is your response?

 

[steveh_131]

Why?!
All that whatever I post is met with is Scorn and Anger because I fail to fall into line with your side.

I will post Logical Arguments as soon as you get your Side of the Paul Camp to do the Same.

How about we forget this "paulbot" and "Paul Camp" nonsense and discuss the issues at hand?

Ron Paul is not the perfect candidate. There is no such thing. So far he is the only one that stands for many of the things that I believe in and has a voting and legislative history to prove it.

Is there a better candidate that meets these criteria? Because that's really the question we should be exploring. Who is the best candidate? And why?

 

[Hotdoger]

Yes, when he pointed out that Paul has a single vote and can't change everything on his own. No candidate could. Nevertheless, his voting record and legislation introduced shows a history of putting his money where his mouth is.

This is a legitimate argument. What is your response?

I was posting to your condesention reply.
I will try again.

BTW are ocsdar posts "legitimate"?

Can you cross the thin Paulbot line and be truthful and call out one of your own?

 

[steveh_131]

I was posting to your condesention reply.
I will try again.

BTW are ocsdar posts "legitimate"?

Can you cross the thin Paulbot line and be truthful and call out one of your own?

He made an argument. Counter it. I don't know what else to say. This is how debates are supposed to progress.

 

[Hotdoger]

He made an argument. Counter it. I don't know what else to say. This is how debates are supposed to progress.

Condesenation and degradation is not an arguement .

 

[Hotdoger]

He made an argument. Counter it. I don't know what else to say. This is how debates are supposed to progress.

Arguement?


Debate?


Wasn't the house of representatives explained to you in school?

Because that would take intelligence.

 

[steveh_131]

See posts 49, 64 and 65 for my arguments on the subject.

Anything to say to them?

 

[Hotdoger]

See posts 49, 64 and 65 for my arguments on the subject.

Anything to say to them?

I have been pretty specific in my questions toward you. You want to answer them with a question .

BTW are ocsdar posts "legitimate"?



Why, to be subject to more condesending commets?



BTW are ocsdar posts "legitimate"?

Can you cross the thin Paulbot line and be truthful and call out one of your own?

 

[steveh_131]

I pointed out the portion of his post that I thought was a legitimate argument on the subject.

 

[The Bubba Effect]

Paulbot? Beep Bop Boop, does not compute...

(I don't get too bent out of shape over being called a Paulbot, because I have always kind of wanted to be a giant killer robot)

 

[Hotdoger]

I pointed out the portion of his post that I thought was a legitimate argument on the subject.

All the while calling my post condesending. Yet you will not call him out.
Call him out for his. It is called being truthful.

 

[Hotdoger]

Instead of responding with further condescension, why not try making an actual argument in response?

Just to remind ya.

 

[The Bubba Effect]

All the while calling my post condesending. Yet you will not call him out.
Call him out for his. It is called being truthful.

Fine, I'll do it.

ocsdar, you were being condescending. Hotdoger, you are being a douche.
Beep Beep Bop

 

[Hotdoger]

Fine, I'll do it.

ocsdar, you were being condescending. Hotdoger, you are being a douche.
Beep Beep Bop

At least I clean things up.

 

[steveh_131]

Instead of responding with further condescension, why not try making an actual argument in response?

All the while calling my post condesending. Yet you will not call him out.
Call him out for his. It is called being truthful.

What do you think I meant by "further"? You met his condescension with condescension. Seriously, get over it. This is the internet.

 

[ocsdor]

Fine, I'll do it.

ocsdar, you were being condescending. Hotdoger, you are being a douche.
Beep Beep Bop

I'll accept being condescending if Hotdoger accepts being a douche.

 

[Hotdoger]

What do you think I meant by "further"? You met his condescension with condescension. Seriously, get over it. This is the internet.

No reson to go further for me.

IThis is where truthfullness comes in.
Some peoples questions are not woth answering because they have answered it with their own remarks. They have their mind made up reguardless of an answer and with their degrading comments they have asked to be treated in the same manor, not to be answered seriously.