RFK Jr to Run for President

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,224
    77
    Porter County
    What then was the need to pull out the shenanigans if Sanders' level of support wasn't a threat?
    A threat to what, win? He was not going to win. Clinton won in every way she could. She won more pledged delegates. She won more unpledged(super), she won the popular vote handily.
    1684839154653.png
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,841
    113
    North Central
    A threat to what, win? He was not going to win. Clinton won in every way she could. She won more pledged delegates. She won more unpledged(super), she won the popular vote handily.
    View attachment 277598
    We do not have a national primary day, it is a process, bern wins NH if not for superdelegates, then the narrative and process changes, Delegates won in states like Indiana do not matter if the race is a forgone conclusion. Without stealing the NH and early races with superdelegates it would have been a completely different story…
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    A threat to what, win? He was not going to win. Clinton won in every way she could. She won more pledged delegates. She won more unpledged(super), she won the popular vote handily.
    View attachment 277598
    So that's why I asked the question. If Sanders had no chance of winning, why did cankles and the dnc feel the need to pull out the election shenanigans? Wouldn't that be a waste of effort while risking credibility with leftist voters that they need. That doesn't make any sense to me.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,224
    77
    Porter County
    We do not have a national primary day, it is a process, bern wins NH if not for superdelegates, then the narrative and process changes, Delegates won in states like Indiana do not matter if the race is a forgone conclusion. Without stealing the NH and early races with superdelegates it would have been a completely different story…
    First, he DID win NH. When the result was reported it would have been him winning and the votes cast for each. No one looked at the delegate count and thought it wasn't a Bernie win. The headlines the next day didn't say Bernie and Hillary tie in NH. Quit trying to make facts fit your narrative. Bernie was even expected to win big going into it.

    Here are a couple of examples for you
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,841
    113
    North Central
    First, he DID win NH. When the result was reported it would have been him winning and the votes cast for each. No one looked at the delegate count and thought it wasn't a Bernie win. The headlines the next day didn't say Bernie and Hillary tie in NH. Quit trying to make facts fit your narrative. Bernie was even expected to win big going into it.

    Here are a couple of examples for you
    EVERYONE, including NYT and CNN knew HRC would win with superdelegate, that was reality, so it never challenged the narrative of HRC inevitably…
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,224
    77
    Porter County
    EVERYONE, including NYT and CNN knew HRC would win with superdelegate, that was reality, so it never challenged the narrative of HRC inevitably…
    What does that have to do with your claim? They didn't "steal" any early races. Super delegates don't even have to announce who they are voting for until the vote at the convention. Bernie could have won without the super delegates, except he lost the regular delegates by 451. That means the super delegates had no bearing on the result. It isn't like Bernie won more pledged delegates and Hillary beat him because of the super delegates.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,841
    113
    North Central
    What does that have to do with your claim? They didn't "steal" any early races. Super delegates don't even have to announce who they are voting for until the vote at the convention. Bernie could have won without the super delegates, except he lost the regular delegates by 451. That means the super delegates had no bearing on the result. It isn't like Bernie won more pledged delegates and Hillary beat him because of the super delegates.
    Got it. You are looking for absolutes in politics that is ran by elaborate favoritism and money. HRC knew who most superdelegates were supporting her. So did the bern, so did the press, yep about everyone.

    Bottom line with superdelegates it was already rigged…
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,224
    77
    Porter County
    Got it. You are looking for absolutes in politics that is ran by elaborate favoritism and money. HRC knew who most superdelegates were supporting her. So did the bern, so did the press, yep about everyone.

    Bottom line with superdelegates it was already rigged…
    Yet you claimed that she won because it looked like Bernie didn't really win NH. I showed you it was not like that at all. Now it was just fixed by super delegates, even though they didn't determine the winner either.

    Yes, Clinton was the chosen one that year. The media was mostly behind her, just like with Biden last time. The D party was behind her, also like with Biden. She won because more people in more states voted for her than Bernie, just as they were told to by those they trusted to give them information.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,841
    113
    North Central
    Yet you claimed that she won because it looked like Bernie didn't really win NH. I showed you it was not like that at all. Now it was just fixed by super delegates, even though they didn't determine the winner either.

    Yes, Clinton was the chosen one that year. The media was mostly behind her, just like with Biden last time. The D party was behind her, also like with Biden. She won because more people in more states voted for her than Bernie, just as they were told to by those they trusted to give them information.
    And I’m saying the superdelegates wildcard affected the actual votes cast, since they were pretty much negotiated ahead of time. Glad repubs, for all their warts have not done that…
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    103,539
    149
    Southside Indy

    View attachment 279913
    iu
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,935
    77
    Camby area
    The guy is sure saying a lot of the right things. For R's who are undecided, he may be worth a listen. I know I am listening.
    Yep. Been watching him speak.

    He is starting to look like that not so hot looking chick at the bar with the great laugh, decent bod, and just looked you in the eye and tied a cherry stem with just her tongue. Ok, now you have my attention...
     
    Top Bottom