President's approval rating hits new low of 41%

[ArcadiaGP]

http://freebeacon.com/politics/cnn-new-poll-a-low-point-for-obamas-entire-presidency/

Post-ABC News poll shows Democrats at risk in November as Obama?s approval rating falls - The Washington Post

One must wonder how low it would be if the media actually scrutinized him, instead of fawning over him.

 

[jamil]

CNN: New Poll a Low Point For Obama?s Entire Presidency | Washington Free Beacon

Post-ABC News poll shows Democrats at risk in November as Obama?s approval rating falls - The Washington Post

One must wonder how low it would be if the media actually scrutinized him, instead of fawning over him.

He'd be doing book signings, maybe some painting. Then there's the library planning.

 

[spec4]

Sad fact is it could continue to go down and he is still in until 1-20-2017. Only positive could be if his low rating causes him to lose the Senate.

 

[rockhopper46038]

I'm saddened that 41 out of 100 people apparently approve of the hatchet job this guy has been doing to this country.

 

[MisterChester]

Actually, this isn't something we shouldn't have expected. W hit 41%, Clinton hit 41% at some point in their presidencies. This is the first time since the very early 19th century that we have had three straight presidents getting two terms. People will vote for the incumbent but then remember why they were bad a few years into term two.

 

[1943Izzy]

Reagan's dipped as low as 38%

 

[churchmouse]

I'm saddened that 41 out of 100 people apparently approve of the hatchet job this guy has been doing to this country.

Think about who the 41% actually are.....they are the porch dwellers riding the mail box.

 

[Henry]

. This is the first time since the very early 19th century that we have had three straight presidents getting two terms.

It would be a stretch for me to believe Barry is straight.

 

[Bennettjh]

I'm saddened that 41 out of 100 people apparently approve of the hatchet job this guy has been doing to this country.

 

[Mark 1911]

I'm saddened that 41 out of 100 people apparently approve of the hatchet job this guy has been doing to this country.

Proof that sheep will never be distracted by the facts. I think it's scary that there are that many of them.

 

[ModernGunner]

Good, keep dropping! His approval rating should be 0%.

 

[brownhornet]

I'm surprised his rating is currently that high! The media are the ones that got him elected and I don't think they will ever admit they were wrong anytime soon.

 

[88GT]

I'm surprised his rating is currently that high! The media are the ones that got him elected and I don't think they will ever admit they were wrong anytime soon.

They don't think they are wrong. Any "failures" are blamed on others, from the Republicans to the population who isn't smart enough to "get it." While not exclusive to the media and Dems, as a whole both groups are far more accepting of the means, whatever they may be, if the end is desirable enough.

 

[Expat]

It appears there has been an uptick in the number of MSM articles that have contained some criticism of the One, from what I have seen. I think the media knows they need to pay some lip service to being the objective, independent watch dog on the political process, so that they can attempt to ravage and destroy the next Republican administration (if we ever get one) and have the masses believe them. But they will need to walk a tight rope as they will not want to harm their "dear leader's" legacy.

 

[jamil]

It appears there has been an uptick in the number of MSM articles that have contained some criticism of the One, from what I have seen. I think the media knows they need to pay some lip service to being the objective, independent watch dog on the political process, so that they can attempt to ravage and destroy the next Republican administration (if we ever get one) and have the masses believe them. But they will need to walk a tight rope as they will not want to harm their "dear leader's" legacy.

A vote for a republican is a vote for the press going back to being the watch dog on the political process.

( I chose plum because it's not quite purple. )

 

[findingZzero]

Actually, this isn't something we shouldn't have expected. W hit 41%, Clinton hit 41% at some point in their presidencies. This is the first time since the very early 19th century that we have had three straight presidents getting two terms. People will vote for the incumbent but then remember why they were bad a few years into term two.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Reagan's dipped as low as 38%

And, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[BigBoxaJunk]

Well, at least Obama's VP only TALKED about shooting someone with a shotgun.

 

[findingZzero]

George W too much swagger, not enough curiosity.
Obama too much professor, not enough swagger.
George H W just right and was called 'wimp' and needed 'the vision thing.'
Clinton. Just right, but didn't get enough in high school then married Hillary.Too much (or too little depending on yer psychology) dick....
You freakin' people are never satisfied.

 

[jamil]

Well, at least Obama's VP only TALKED about shooting someone with a shotgun.

Now I'm sure Cheney really believed whatshisname really needed shot.

 

[jamil]

George W too much swagger, not enough curiosity.
Obama too much professor, not enough swagger.
George H W just right and was called 'wimp' and needed 'the vision thing.'
Clinton. Just right, but Too much dick....
You freakin' people are never satisfied.

I'll agree on George W.
Obama. Too much community organizing, ideological partisan, not enough real-world problem solving, leadership.
I'll disagree on G H W but too much stuff to put into a one-liner.
Clinton. Smarmy leftist...nuff said.