Lol, ok.
Why the heck not? obama has been more detrimental to this country than lil kim has by a LONG shot.
Further, does anyone little doubt that BHO would have done far more harm but for our (frayed) system of checks and balances and the citizens' ultimate veto?
He would have felt perfectly at ease as a tinpot "leader" in just about any festering third world country or other socialist country, so it should surprise no one that much of his style and substance bore such striking resemblance to that of the third world/socialism.
It also at least partially accounts for his peculiar affinity for Iran and Cuba and animus for the UK and Israel, among our other allies.
So you think Obama is as evil as Kim Jong Un too, 'eh?
Depends on definition of evil. Both sought the destruction of the US as we know it. Obama had the ability to do it, Kim just had the desire.
obama isn't evil in the sense he wants genocide, but he's evil in the sense he wanted to destroy America as founded
C'mon Doc, even you have to admit that "evil" is completely unwarranted. Say his policies suck, say he was a political idiot; that's fine and provable... but to say he's evil? You haven't drank that much Kool-aid.
So you think Obama is as evil as Kim Jong Un too, 'eh?
What too many Americans fail to see, probably because they don't want to confront it, is that BHO is the first president ever who rejects the US as founded, and he sought to do whatever he could to turn us into something we were never intended to be.
Using the IRS to put the boot on the neck of those who would oppose him for reelection, then seeing to it that his politicized Injustice Department did not investigate, even though top IRS officials actually took the Fifth.
Seeking every opportunity to stir up racial animus: "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon." "The Cambridge police department behaved stupidly."
Guess what, there actually are people out there who despise him for what he has done, not for his ethnicity, and not because of persistent fringe "theories" that he's not a natural born citizen eligible for the presidency.
Kim Jon Un would destroy us from without, while BHO has sought as many opportunities as he could to destroy us from within.
If you want to engage in straw man arguments or play your little 'I know your real motivation' game, you won't get me to play along.
None of this address the "evil" claim. I'm trying to keep it simple. Is he evil not?
You do this on an iPhone, right?
None of this address the "evil" claim. I'm trying to keep it simple. Is he evil not?
It is perplexing how someone who has repeatedly deliberately made statements that have resulted in your profession becoming a target for extreme animus doesn't meet that criterion.
Why the heck not? obama has been more detrimental to this country than lil kim has by a LONG shot.
Really????
If you have the belief that the president did so to have harm come to police officers, then yes, I'd agree that it is evil. Now if you have the beliefs that his statements were stupid, and unwarranted, but did not wish harm upon anyone, then I would disagree. Which do you believe?
That excuse might have been valid if he had refrained from commenting about these cases in a manner that even a moderately intelligent person would have known was inflammatory after the first time, maybe after the second time; but when it is repeated clear into year seven, with actual killings and other violence that surely were not quelled by a more temperate comment from the PRESIDENT OF THE ****ING UNITED STATES, well, call me crazy, but no one is really that stupid.
It's long past that.
Ok, you think he's evil because he wants harm to come to police officers. That's you're opinion, and you're entitled to it.
"Ye shall know them by their fruits."
-Matthew7:15
There is none so blind as he who will not see.