Neil Tyson Making More Stuff Up

[Rob377]

Nope, but your subject is religion based and against the rules as PaulF sees it.

I've never understood why people worship nerdposer NdGT. Kind of an odd religious affiliation - but who am I to judge?

 

[Kirk Freeman]

nerdposer NdGT

We are going this way? Not L. Neil Tyson?

Well . . . Ok . . . *kicks rocks, hands in pockets*

 

[pudly]

Are you still here? I heard that you were banned...

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Are you still here? I heard that you were banned...

If you strike me down, I shall return even more argumentative than you can possibly imagine.

 

[rhino]

If you strike me down, I shall return even more argumentative than you can possibly imagine.

I find that ludicrously difficult to imagine.

(see what I did there?)

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Cult of NdGT continues its march to hide the fabrications: Why Is Wikipedia Scrubbing All References To Neil Tyson's Fabrication?

It's like they are anti-science or something.

 

[steveh_131]

Cult of NdGT continues its march to hide the fabrications: Why Is Wikipedia Scrubbing All References To Neil Tyson's Fabrication?

It's like they are anti-science or something.

This isn't really a cult of Tyson. Wikipedia is heavily edited by the movement known as the 'skeptics', who are actually anything but.

Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia

This movement worships guys like Tyson, Bill Nye, and other celebrity "scientists".

Kirk, you often buy into their propaganda hook line and sinker when it comes to medicine.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Maybe it's time for INGO to treat threads and posts about folks like NdGT the same as they do threads and posts about religion. It's obvious to many, these guys are the priests of their religion of science.

 

[Jomibe]

Anywho, Tyson is full of it. Just thought INGO should know.

I guess I'm not on ingo enough, or maybe I'm just a little brighter than all y'all ( ) but I cant stand the guy and never have been able to stand the guy. Bunch of drivel.

 

[Ericpwp]

Thanks for the link, he always seemed full of it.

 

[Streck-Fu]

Sure thing. I enjoyed it very much, excepting the political nonsense at the end.

At the end? I could not get half way through the first episode with all the historical revisions and fabrications.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Kirk, you often buy into their propaganda hook line and sinker when it comes to medicine.

I am like that as a well-known leader of the anti-bimbo-as-scientist movement.

 

[ModernGunner]

I like watching Tyson on cosmology and astrophysics. He's sort of the P.T. Barnum of astronomy, and has the ability to get folks interested. That's a GOOD thing, JMO.

Astrophysicist who's a good showman? Sure. "Brilliant" astrophysicist? Wholeheartedly disagree. Tyson's simply not in the same category as Hawking, Susskind, Sagan, Kaku, or Filippenko.

Then there's the fact that he's a staunch lefty-loon liberal, and global warming conspiracy fear-mongering Liar-In-Chief supporter, which entirely negates any positive contributions Tyson's made toward astronomy and astrophysics.

Stick to doing shows about astronomy, Tyson. You have a gift for them. Beyond that, even discussing peanut butter & jelly vs. peanut butter & banana sandwiches, you're way behind even the minimum level of 'smarts' required.

 

[pudly]

Just because it is Tyson-related: How Do You Define a Planet? Pluto Gets a Vote of Support

 

[rhino]

I am like that as a well-known leader of the anti-bimbo-as-scientist movement.

Well, you actually believe that regular brushing and flossing of your teeth with proper technique is actually good for you. I can't believe you fell for that load o' hooey from the medical community.

 

[steveh_131]

Well, you actually believe that regular brushing and flossing of your teeth with proper technique is actually good for you. I can't believe you fell for that load o' hooey from the medical community.

Actually, Kirk regularly mocks the idea that hygiene has an significant impact on wellness.

 

[mbills2223]

I like watching Tyson on cosmology and astrophysics. He's sort of the P.T. Barnum of astronomy, and has the ability to get folks interested. That's a GOOD thing, JMO.

Astrophysicist who's a good showman? Sure. "Brilliant" astrophysicist? Wholeheartedly disagree. Tyson's simply not in the same category as Hawking, Susskind, Sagan, Kaku, or Filippenko.

Then there's the fact that he's a staunch lefty-loon liberal, and global warming conspiracy fear-mongering Liar-In-Chief supporter, which entirely negates any positive contributions Tyson's made toward astronomy and astrophysics.

Stick to doing shows about astronomy, Tyson. You have a gift for them. Beyond that, even discussing peanut butter & jelly vs. peanut butter & banana sandwiches, you're way behind even the minimum level of 'smarts' required.

I agree. I think he's a very good astrophysicist, but brilliant definitely has to be reserved for the exceptional.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Actually, Kirk regularly mocks the idea that hygiene has an significant impact on wellness.

I'm a rebel.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Tyson's followers attacking those who attack Tyson because good science NEEDS a wall of spears: Wikipedia Is Now Trying To Eliminate The Federalist's Online Entry

 

[pudly]

If you can't argue the message, then you must stop the messenger.