You know Indiana may be in a unique circumstance. And it gives me an idea for a tactical rifle.
The calibers that THE REST OF THE KNOWN WORLD hunt deer and other large game don't sell for crap in this state. Doesn't surprise me. Just what ARE you going to shoot with a hollow point/soft point in these calibers in this state? And even in this extreme panic, you can find piles of .243, 30-06, 7mm-08, 260, 270 etc etc sitting on any wall mart, gander mountain, or meiers and no one touches it for anything. Most I looked at had some serious dust on them.
That got me to thinking.. what about a tactical gun in these calibers with 20 round magazines?
30-06 used to be a military caliber, but the Garand only holds eight rounds and can be finicky about the pressures some of these loads develop, so it's out. The M1918 BAR has an adjustable gas system, but that honker is 20 pounds and expensive as hell, even in M1918A3 semi auto form. So perhaps 30-06 is out.
Now looking at these carts, I remember many of them are based off the 308/7.62x51 cart. 243win and 358win being the first. Then rem brought out the 7mm-08 and 260. All of these are necked down (or in the case of 358 necked up)
.358 Win, I am going to throw out of consideration. Overkill. And recoil overload for tactical applications.
That leaves 7mm-08, 260, and 243. A quick search finds that both AR-10s and M14(M1A) rifles and barrels have been made in each of the three calibers (and 358). All of the cartridges would be somewhere in between 308 and 223 in recoil, and an intermediate cartridge is what everyone has been after for anyway.
Mag wise they use the same 308 mags.
The downside to this is that you would be shooting expensive hollow points all the time as FMJs in these calibers can be near unobtainium. But perhaps it beats having nothing to shoot at all.
And with the AR-10 it would be easy to do a barrel swap once the panicking stops. The M14/M1A requiring a smith who is an expert in those rifles to swap barrels.
So..... AR-10 in 7mm-08, 260, or 243?
Thoughts or ideas?
The calibers that THE REST OF THE KNOWN WORLD hunt deer and other large game don't sell for crap in this state. Doesn't surprise me. Just what ARE you going to shoot with a hollow point/soft point in these calibers in this state? And even in this extreme panic, you can find piles of .243, 30-06, 7mm-08, 260, 270 etc etc sitting on any wall mart, gander mountain, or meiers and no one touches it for anything. Most I looked at had some serious dust on them.
That got me to thinking.. what about a tactical gun in these calibers with 20 round magazines?
30-06 used to be a military caliber, but the Garand only holds eight rounds and can be finicky about the pressures some of these loads develop, so it's out. The M1918 BAR has an adjustable gas system, but that honker is 20 pounds and expensive as hell, even in M1918A3 semi auto form. So perhaps 30-06 is out.
Now looking at these carts, I remember many of them are based off the 308/7.62x51 cart. 243win and 358win being the first. Then rem brought out the 7mm-08 and 260. All of these are necked down (or in the case of 358 necked up)
.358 Win, I am going to throw out of consideration. Overkill. And recoil overload for tactical applications.
That leaves 7mm-08, 260, and 243. A quick search finds that both AR-10s and M14(M1A) rifles and barrels have been made in each of the three calibers (and 358). All of the cartridges would be somewhere in between 308 and 223 in recoil, and an intermediate cartridge is what everyone has been after for anyway.
Mag wise they use the same 308 mags.
The downside to this is that you would be shooting expensive hollow points all the time as FMJs in these calibers can be near unobtainium. But perhaps it beats having nothing to shoot at all.
And with the AR-10 it would be easy to do a barrel swap once the panicking stops. The M14/M1A requiring a smith who is an expert in those rifles to swap barrels.
So..... AR-10 in 7mm-08, 260, or 243?
Thoughts or ideas?
Last edited: