Let me preface this with the statement that I am not condoning this nor do I think it would do anything other than put additional burdens upon law-abiding citizens.
That said, the left is calling for the "gun show loop-hole" to be closed. If Congress were to pass a law calling for any transfer to go through a NICS check and for the firearm to be documented on a form 4473, couldn't they (Congress) make it a condition of holding an FFL that if if you were approached by any parties that wanted to do a transfer that you would be required to assist?
My other question is, could they (Congress) set a maximum amount that the FFL holder could charge for said transfer, say $20?
Again, I'm not condoning this. I do not think it would prevent any tragedies, but it would place additional burdens on those that already obey the law.
That said, the left is calling for the "gun show loop-hole" to be closed. If Congress were to pass a law calling for any transfer to go through a NICS check and for the firearm to be documented on a form 4473, couldn't they (Congress) make it a condition of holding an FFL that if if you were approached by any parties that wanted to do a transfer that you would be required to assist?
My other question is, could they (Congress) set a maximum amount that the FFL holder could charge for said transfer, say $20?
Again, I'm not condoning this. I do not think it would prevent any tragedies, but it would place additional burdens on those that already obey the law.