Indy woman sentenced for federal firearms charges

[bwframe]

Indy woman sentenced for federal firearms charges

INDIANAPOLIS — An Indianapolis woman was sentenced in federal court this week for her role in the illegal purchase of over 30 guns during in the summer of 2019. Court documents indicate that,…

fox59.com

 

[Knight Rider]

14 months probation supposedly trafficking 60+ guns in Indy? Why even bother going through the motions.

But by all means, make it harder for law abiding folks to buy firearms for legitimate purposes.

 

[Ziggidy]

She knowingly buys guns for someone else. The “someone else” gets rid of them and some of the guns are repeatedly used in crimes. Crimes included shootings, carjackings and drug deals! Patrick gets 14 months probation?

Should she be charged with being an accomplice to the other crimes?

 

[Pepi]

She knowingly buys guns for someone else. The “someone else” gets rid of them and some of the guns are repeatedly used in crimes. Crimes included shootings, carjackings and drug deals! Patrick gets 14 months probation?

Should she be charged with being an accomplice to the other crimes?

Give her time to figure out how to not get caught next time SMH

 

[mmpsteve]

"Investigators said that Patrick purchased at least 36 firearms from federal firearms licensees within Indianapolis on at least eight separate occasions between June 15, 2019, and Aug. 9, 2019."

36 firearms in 55 days. How does that happen without throwing up a red flag somewhere, at some level?. That don't smell right. I'm a collector, but 36 is a lot in a short time.

I imagine if I did what she did, in NWI, I'd be facing a few years hard time. Equal protection under the law, and all that ...

.

 

[KLB]

36 firearms in 55 days. How does that happen without throwing up a red flag somewhere, at some level?. That don't smell right. I'm a collector, but 36 is a lot in a short time.

What flag? Where? Unless she bought multiple handguns at the same time, there shouldn't be anything tracking the purchases.

What is the appropriate number of purchases in 55 days to not throw up a flag?

 

[Alamo]

14 months probation supposedly trafficking 60+ guns in Indy? Why even bother going through the motions.

Of which the first eight months are restricted to home and GPS monitoring… which means the final six months are … ? PO visits?

 

[mmpsteve]

What flag? Where? Unless she bought multiple handguns at the same time, there shouldn't be anything tracking the purchases.

What is the appropriate number of purchases in 55 days to not throw up a flag?

Point taken. In the original article, it mentions 36 firearms in 55 days on at least 8 separate occasions. I guess it could have been 36 distinct purchases, and my assumptions led me astray. You'd think it would be easily knowable by authorities what the number of 4473's that were processed, yet they only mention 8.

I wonder when the 4473 is processed, if your prior history pops up before the proceed is issued.

I'm not saying there is any particular number that should raise red flags, but the buying pattern in this case is nefarious on it's face. I don't know what it is that should trigger a closer scrutiny, but the facts would support that closer scrutiny was warranted.

.

 

[TheGrumpyGuy]

14 months probation supposedly trafficking 60+ guns in Indy? Why even bother going through the motions.

But by all means, make it harder for law abiding folks to buy firearms for legitimate purposes.

Well, you do realize the Left has to take into account the cost of properly grooming an individual like this, so in the interest of saving both time and money...

 

[KLB]

Point taken. In the original article, it mentions 36 firearms in 55 days on at least 8 separate occasions. I guess it could have been 36 distinct purchases, and my assumptions led me astray. You'd think it would be easily knowable by authorities what the number of 4473's that were processed, yet they only mention 8.

I wonder when the 4473 is processed, if your prior history pops up before the proceed is issued.

I'm not saying there is any particular number that should raise red flags, but the buying pattern in this case is nefarious on it's face. I don't know what it is that should trigger a closer scrutiny, but the facts would support that closer scrutiny was warranted.

.

That would be getting into formal registry territory.

You're falling into the "there has to be something we can do" mentality. That is not a good rabbit hole to start down.

 

[KLB]

Well, you do realize the Left has to take into account the cost of properly grooming an individual like this, so in the interest of saving both time and money...

What? A woman willing to do what her man asks her to do without question?

 

[TheGrumpyGuy]

What? A woman willing to do what her man asks her to do without question?

If she knows what's good for her...

 

[cbhausen]

I don’t care how many guns anyone buys within a certain timeframe. I’m not willing to go down that rabbit hole. It’s what you do with them that matters.

 

[bwframe]

It'd be interesting to see what would happen, should this fine lady go to purchase another firearm today?

Would her NICS check go through or be denied?

 

[oze]

She knowingly buys guns for someone else. The “someone else” gets rid of them and some of the guns are repeatedly used in crimes. Crimes included shootings, carjackings and drug deals! Patrick gets 14 months probation?

Should she be charged with being an accomplice to the other crimes?

Yes. Straw purchasers are the scum of the earth, and need to be treated as such. As always, imo.

 

[oze]

What? A woman willing to do what her man asks her to do without question?

Yeah, what is this, 1955?

 

[oze]

I don’t care how many guns anyone buys within a certain timeframe. I’m not willing to go down that rabbit hole. It’s what you do with them that matters.

Agreed. And if selling or giving them to someone who isn't able to purchase them himself is what they're doing with them then yeah, follow that rabbit.

 

[bgcatty]

Ridiculous result! Should’ve been locked up a long, long time!!!

 

[sadclownwp]

"Investigators said that Patrick purchased at least 36 firearms from federal firearms licensees within Indianapolis on at least eight separate occasions between June 15, 2019, and Aug. 9, 2019."

36 firearms in 55 days. How does that happen without throwing up a red flag somewhere, at some level?. That don't smell right. I'm a collector, but 36 is a lot in a short time.

I imagine if I did what she did, in NWI, I'd be facing a few years hard time. Equal protection under the law, and all that ...

.

What kind of liberal red flag BS is this? No red flag laws, period. Freedom.

 

[Ark]

Oh hey, a gangbanger's girlfriend finally prosecuted for buying guns for him. That's a surprise.

Probation and community service, of course, not a surprise. The women always get off light.