IN Father loses children for pointing out illegal court practices.

[level.eleven]

The title says it all. Don't pull back the curtain, you will be punished.​

Indiana Dad Sentenced to Five Years for Criticizing Judge, Custody Evaluator « Fathers & Families​

DanHelpsKids Home​

5 years in jail for pointing out the judge's handpicked "expert" wasn't even licensed in the state of Indiana.​

I misspelled children.​

 

[IndyDave1776]

It sounds like a judge, a prosecutor, and an 'expert' all need to be in prison.

Considering that the 'expert' asked questions of a sexual nature of women but not men, could it be that he was hunting some strange for himself and/or the judge?

 

[Hotdoger]

Is this the judge?


Hon. James D. Humphrey | Indiana Court Times

 

[trapperDave]

sounds like Hancock County

 

[Kirk Freeman]

5 years in jail for pointing out the judge's handpicked "expert" wasn't even licensed in the state of Indiana.

Ummm, that's not what put him in prison.

 

[level.eleven]

Ummm, that's not what put him in prison.

Yeah, I guess the judge didn't like manner in which he pointed out the corruption after all the procedural remedies failed.

 

[Hotdoger]

Ummm, that's not what put him in prison.

He is in prison?

 

[88GT]

Ummm, that's not what put him in prison.

I do find it funny that the article doesn't list the charges.

Given the absolute dearth of any meaningful information in this article, I'm withholding judgment until such time as the facts, relevant ones, may be presented.

And Mr. Brewington was a fool for representing himself.

 

[88GT]

Yeah, I guess the judge didn't like manner in which he pointed out the corruption after all the procedural remedies failed.

Since you seem to know more than the article states, what WERE the charges and convictions?

 

[CX1]

Since you seem to know more than the article states, what WERE the charges and convictions?

Wasn't directed at me but since I'm reading the appeal it was three counts of intimidation and one count of attempted obstruction of justice.

It is a lengthy convoluted story and the appeal does really not make the defendant look very bright.
Among other things he posted the Judges home address and urged people to write to the Judges wife for some reason.

And to be clear the Judge that convicted him was not the Judge he was having all the issues with. So its not a case of the guy arguing with a Judge and that same Judge put him in jail which is somewhat how I took it from the thread title.

 

[parsimonious]

mmnnggrrhhh. there is nothing in this post, or article that I like.

I agree with 88. Not enough details, and everyone who represents themselves
legally, legally represents a fool.

 

[level.eleven]

Since you seem to know more than the article states, what WERE the charges and convictions?

From the article...

The State of Indiana, by grand jury, has indicted the defendant with Count I,
Intimidation, a Class "A" Misdemeanor, Count II, Intimidation of a Judge, a Class "D" Felony, Count III, Intimidation, a Class "A" Misdemeanor, Count IV,
Attempt to Commit Obstruction of Justice, a Class "D" Felony.

Jury convicted on these four, and not guilty of a fifth.

 

[Hotdoger]

I do find it funny that the article doesn't list the charges.

Given the absolute dearth of any meaningful information in this article, I'm withholding judgment until such time as the facts, relevant ones, may be presented.

And Mr. Brewington was a fool for representing himself.

Seems he has a lawyer:

Untitled Document

 

[Magneto]

A friend once told me that representing yourself in a divorce is the WORST thing you can do. His brother tried it and ended up doing the right thing and getting an attorney after some shenanigans by people similar to this. In the end it all worked out.

 

[Hotdoger]

From the article...

The State of Indiana, by grand jury, has indicted the defendant with Count I,
Intimidation, a Class "A" Misdemeanor, Count II, Intimidation of a Judge, a Class "D" Felony, Count III, Intimidation, a Class "A" Misdemeanor, Count IV,
Attempt to Commit Obstruction of Justice, a Class "D" Felony.

Jury convicted on these four, and not guilty of a fifth.

Seems some good stuff will come out if it goes to trial:

Dr_Connor_Cross_Examination

 

[Hotdoger]

They were surprised to hear the story of how I used my Blackberry to record the video of Dearborn County police officer harassing me in the courthouse.

Can't go against the man!

Hamilton County Justice Center

 

[level.eleven]

Seems some good stuff will come out if it goes to trial:

Dr_Connor_Cross_Examination

Why didn't they just give the guy a copy of the darn evaluation like they had said they would?

 

[Hotdoger]

Why didn't they just give the guy a copy of the darn evaluation like they had said they would?

Why would the judge not order it?

 

[IndyDave1776]

Why would the judge not order it?

Unfortunately, there are far too many judges who don't give a damn about the truth.

 

[88GT]

Seems he has a lawyer:

Untitled Document

He didn't for the divorce!