Not clairvoyant at all, I saw a man get out, forgive me for saying hopping, grab an object, the officer shout commands, the man didn't heed them, officer shot, quickly realized it was a mistake, NOT A bad shoot, a horrible mistake. Would it wrap one of us without a badge up in a whole bundle of shyte, probably, but if you don't like that go get sworn, and spend a couple of years on the streets. This was a Horrible mistake, the officer will live with the rest of his life, but should it end his career? I don't think so, YMMV.Don't remember seeing that in any of the human training videos must have missed it. Old people have a tendency to do things like this, and as far as "hopping", well never mind. Must be cool to be clairvoyant though.
The officer obviously believed it was a gun and the guy got out of the vehile and didnt stop reaching. It was a justified shooting. Just a bad bad accident...
Does this also apply to dads who shoot their daughter's unarmed boyfriends while in their daughters bed?Why does LE seem immune to one of the cardinal rules of firearm safety? Know your target. Doesn't that mean ascertaining with a fair degree of certainty who it is and why he deserves to be shot?
Does this also apply to dads who shoot their daughter's unarmed boyfriends while in their daughters bed?
You have stats saying this is NOT an isolated incident? Out of millions of traffic stops, how often does this happen? Please school me.Right on script again... "It's just an isolated incident!"
As for "lit up", it was an old man. Slow, probably a little deaf. Better shoot him. Officer Safety.
Not sure why it took so long.I have been waiting for this to come up.
Not sure why it took so long.
Same with the teenage boy.This would have ended very differently had he followed instructions.
I vote good shoot both ways, one a horrible mistake, the other was a dumb bimbo teen trying to get out of trouble and causing the death of her play toy. Both good shoots based on the given evidence.Does this also apply to dads who shoot their daughter's unarmed boyfriends while in their daughters bed?
We have the luxury of examining this FOREVER as is normal here. But the shoot/no shoot scenarios take milliseconds to unfold. The gift if 20\20 hindsight.
Yes, while we might be confronted with these decisions more often, we are certainly not the only ones. I have not condemned the dad nor am I condemning the officer. Both are tragic and those responsible will have to live with their decisions. I hope I never get placed into this situation...EVER. As good of of a job I try to do, as a firearms instructor, and as a combatives instructor, I could EASILY be placed in the same situation that could force me to fire on a person with whom I thought was armed only to find out they were not. I will them be demonized for a good decision at the time I had to make it.As experienced by both the LEO and the DAD............
It would not have even dawned on me to shoot the guy. I guess I need more training.
No, it's not an assumption. In a me vs you scenario, the "me" always wins when "you" is perceived to be a threat. And I would think this obviously isn't unique to police, would you agree?